SynthesisRheumatology international2024
Efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in systemic sclerosis: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Rheumatology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveSystemic sclerosis (SSc) is a highly heterogeneous disease whose treatment is based mainly on immunosuppressants, antifibrotics, and vasodilators. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) have proved effective in other autoimmune diseases. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IVIG in SSc.
methodsThe systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA Statement. Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched until March 2024. We assessed the quality of included studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool (RoB 2) for randomised clinical trials and the Cochrane Risk in non-randomized studies (ROBINS-I) tool for observational studies.
resultsFrom 1242 studies identified, 15 studies were included, of which 14 were observational studies. In total, 361 patients with SSc were included, and 295 received treatment with IVIG. Most of the studies used a dose of 2 g/kg IVIG. Ten studies, including the clinical trial, showed high risk of bias, and five had a critical risk. Skin involvement was assessed using modified Rodnan skin score, in 11 studies and the authors reported cutaneous efficacy in 9 of them. The 6 studies that assessed muscle involvement reported an improvement. Six studies reported data on gastrointestinal efficacy. Other domains such as lung and joint involvement and steroid-sparing effect were evaluated. The most frequent adverse events were mild, including headache, abdominal pain, fever, and skin rash.
conclusionTreatment with IVIG in SSc patients could be helpful and safe in patients with cutaneous, muscular, or digestive manifestations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38748220What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.