Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38748214›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2024

Reirradiation for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: prognostic radiomic factors at progression.

Dominik Wawrzuta, Marzanna Chojnacka, Monika Drogosiewicz, Katarzyna Pędziwiatr, Bożenna Dembowska-Bagińska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Re-irradiation in progressive diffuse infiltrative pontine glioma in children and young adults.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dominik WawrzutaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wawelska 15B, 02-034, Warsaw, Poland. dominik.wawrzuta@nio.gov.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-0846-8906
Marzanna ChojnackaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wawelska 15B, 02-034, Warsaw, Poland.
Monika DrogosiewiczDepartment of Oncology, Children's Memorial Health Institute, Al. Dzieci Polskich 20, 04-730, Warsaw, Poland.
Katarzyna PędziwiatrDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wawelska 15B, 02-034, Warsaw, Poland.
Bożenna Dembowska-BagińskaDepartment of Oncology, Children's Memorial Health Institute, Al. Dzieci Polskich 20, 04-730, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDiffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is a lethal pediatric brain tumor. Radiation therapy (RT) is the standard treatment, with reirradiation considered in case of progression. However, the prognostic factors for reirradiation are not well understood. This study aims to investigate the outcomes of DIPG patients undergoing reirradiation and identify clinical and radiomic prognostic factors.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with DIPG who underwent reirradiation at our institution between January 2016 and December 2023. Using PyRadiomics, we extracted radiomic features of tumors at the time of progression from FLAIR MRI images and collected clinical data. We used the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (lasso) for Cox's proportional hazard model with leave-one-out cross-validation to select optimal prognostic factors for survival after reirradiation.

resultsThe study included 18 patients who underwent reirradiation at first progression, receiving a total dose of 20 Gy or 24 Gy in 2‑Gy fractions. Reirradiation was well tolerated, with no severe toxicity. Most patients (78%) showed neurological improvement after treatment. Median survival after progression was 29.2 weeks. The Cox model demonstrated a concordance of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.75-0.88), revealing that tumor sphericity and structural gray-level heterogeneity in FLAIR MRI images were associated with longer survival of reirradiated patients.

conclusionReirradiation is a safe and effective approach for patients with DIPG. MRI-based radiomic models could be helpful in predicting survival after reirradiation.

Indexed as

Brain Stem NeoplasmsDiffuse Intrinsic Pontine GliomaDisease ProgressionMagnetic Resonance ImagingRe-IrradiationAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMalePrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRadiomicsRadiotherapy DosageRetrospective StudiesDiffuse intrinsic pontine gliomaDiffuse midline gliomaMagnetic resonance imagingRadiomicsRadiotherapyReirradiation

Identifiers

PMID38748214
PMCPMC11343881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.