Observational studySleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2024
Screening for treatment-required sleep apnoea in patients with spinal cord injury within one year after injury in a rehabilitation setting.
Observational study in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An update on sleep disordered breathing in spinal cord injury.Current opinion in pulmonary medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe current study aims to assess the efficacy of the Stop-Bang Questionnaire (SBQ) in screening treatment-required sleep apnoea following Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). Additionally, we explore the performance of combined questionnaires and pulse oximetry to determine the most cost-effective method.
methodsThe study employs a cross-sectional observational design. All patients admitted to in-hospital rehabilitation at the Spinal Cord Injury Centre of Western Denmark from September 2022 to February 2023 were continuously enrolled. Participating patients underwent SBQ screening, a standard sleep questionnaire, and cardiorespiratory monitoring, followed by an individual consultation with a physician.
resultsDuring the study period, 35 SCI patients were admitted, with 24 providing informed consent. Among the 24 included patients, there was a 75% prevalence of mild to severe sleep apnoea, and 46% had treatment-required sleep apnoea. The SBQ missed only one patient with treatment-required sleep apnoea but misclassified eight patients. Combining SBQ with the pulse oximetry demonstrated the best performance in identifying patients with sleep apnoea.
conclusionThe study indicates that SBQ alone is insufficient for screening treatment-required sleep apnoea. Exploratory analysis suggests that combining SBQ with a simple pulse oximetry measurement might enhance accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.