ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2024
Should aortic stiffness parameters be used in MIS-C patient follow-up?
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular abnormalities in multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children related to COVID-19.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We evaluated the short- and long-term effects of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) on their cardiovascular system. The study population consisted of 38 MIS-C patients and 55 control patients. Standard echocardiographic measurements and aortic stiffness parameters were compared between the two groups at different time points. During the standard echocardiographic examination at the time of diagnosis, mitral valve insufficiency was detected in 42% of the cases, left ventricular systolic dysfunction in 36%, aortic valve insufficiency in 3%, tricuspid valve insufficiency in 13%, and coronary artery dilatation in 31%. The ejection fraction, pulse pressure of the experimental group were significantly lower than the control group (p < 0.01, p = 0.045, respectively). When aortic stiffness parameters were compared, it was seen that the parameters increased in the experimental group and the difference was significant for aortic distensibility. (p = 0.105, p = 0.029 respectively). When comparing the experimental group's results at diagnosis and at the sixth month, there was a decrease in aortic stiffness parameters at the sixth month compared to the time of diagnosis, but the difference wasn't significant (p = 0.514, p = 0.334). However, no statistically significant difference was detected when comparing the aortic distensibility results of the experimental group with the control group at the sixth month (p = 0.667). Our results showed that many pathological echocardiographic findings detected at diagnosis in MIS-C patients returned to normal within six months. Therefore, we believe that the cardiovascular follow-up period of MIS-C cases should be at least six months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38748055What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.