Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38747974›Full record

ReviewClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2024

Arming Vδ2 T Cells with Chimeric Antigen Receptors to Combat Cancer.

Pauline Thomas, Pierre Paris, Claire Pecqueur

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pauline Thomas *Nantes Université, CRCI2NA, INSERM, CNRS, Nantes, France.ORCID 0009-0006-6081-1448
Pierre Paris *Nantes Université, CRCI2NA, INSERM, CNRS, Nantes, France.ORCID 0009-0005-9584-7523
Claire PecqueurNantes Université, CRCI2NA, INSERM, CNRS, Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7612-1672

Funding

Institut National Du Cancer (INCa) TUMC21-40ITMO Cancer of AviesanLa Ligue Contre le Cancer and Fondation ARC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy has emerged as a promising approach in the field of cancer treatment, with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy demonstrating remarkable success. However, challenges such as tumor antigen heterogeneity, immune evasion, and the limited persistence of CAR-T cells have prompted the exploration of alternative cell types for CAR-based strategies. Gamma delta T cells, a unique subset of lymphocytes with inherent tumor recognition capabilities and versatile immune functions, have garnered increasing attention in recent years. In this review, we present how arming Vδ2-T cells might be the basis for next-generation immunotherapies against solid tumors. Following a comprehensive overview of γδ T-cell biology and innovative CAR engineering strategies, we discuss the clinical potential of Vδ2 CAR-T cells in overcoming the current limitations of immunotherapy in solid tumors. Although the applications of Vδ2 CAR-T cells in cancer research are relatively in their infancy and many challenges are yet to be identified, Vδ2 CAR-T cells represent a promising breakthrough in cancer immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasmsReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-deltaReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmHumansImmunotherapyT-LymphocytesAntigens, NeoplasmReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-deltaReceptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID38747974
PMCPMC11292201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.