Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38747883›Full record

SynthesisArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery2024

ARE THERE ADVANTAGES IN DOUBLE TRANSIT RECONSTRUCTION AFTER TOTAL GASTRECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH GASTRIC CANCER? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.

Luigi Carlo da Silva Costa, Ary Augusto de Castro Macedo, Juliana Mattei de Araújo, Ewerton Lima da Silva, Luís Felipe Gomes Reis de Moraes, Aline Dos Santos, Hugo Gomes Soares, Valdir Tercioti Junior, João de Souza Coelho Neto, Nelson Adami Andreollo and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Luigi Carlo da Silva CostaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Postgraduate Program in Surgical Sciences - Campinas (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9212-2993
Ary Augusto de Castro MacedoUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Postgraduate Program in Surgical Sciences - Campinas (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1516-5946
Juliana Mattei de AraújoUniversidade do Estado do Pará, Medical School - Marabá (PA), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1195-4112
Ewerton Lima da SilvaUniversidade do Estado do Pará, Medical School - Marabá (PA), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5794-633X
Luís Felipe Gomes Reis de MoraesUniversidade do Estado do Pará, Medical School - Marabá (PA), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9815-673X
Aline Dos SantosUniversidade do Estado do Pará, Medical School - Marabá (PA), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-8685-1879
Hugo Gomes SoaresUniversidade do Estado do Pará, Medical School - Marabá (PA), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8398-4575
Valdir Tercioti JuniorUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department of Surgery - Campinas (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0510-7360
João de Souza Coelho NetoUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department of Surgery - Campinas (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7415-1635
Nelson Adami AndreolloUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department of Surgery - Campinas (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7452-1165
Luiz Roberto LopesUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department of Surgery - Campinas (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8996-6658

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurative treatment for gastric cancer involves tumor resection, followed by transit reconstruction, with Roux-en-Y being the main technique employed. To permit food transit to the duodenum, which is absent in Roux-en-Y, double transit reconstruction has been used, whose theoretical advantages seem to surpass the previous technique.

aimsTo compare the clinical evolution of gastric cancer patients who underwent total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y and double tract reconstruction.

methodsA systematic review was carried out on Web of Science, Scopus, EmbasE, SciELO, Virtual Health Library, PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases. Data were collected until June 11, 2022. Observational studies or clinical trials evaluating patients submitted to double tract (DT) and Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstructions were included. There was no temporal or language restriction. Review articles, case reports, case series, and incomplete texts were excluded. The risk of bias was calculated using the Cochrane tool designed for randomized clinical trials.

resultsFour studies of good methodological quality were included, encompassing 209 participants. In the RY group, there was a greater reduction in food intake. In the DT group, the decrease in body mass index was less pronounced compared to preoperative values.

conclusionsThe double tract reconstruction had better outcomes concerning body mass index and the time until starting a light diet; however, it did not present any advantages in relation to nutritional deficits, quality of life, and post-surgical complications.

Indexed as

Anastomosis, Roux-en-YGastrectomyStomach NeoplasmsGastrointestinal TransitHumansPlastic Surgery Procedures

Identifiers

PMID38747883
PMCPMC11090104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.