Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38747818›Full record

Observational studyCritical care science2024

Driving pressure, as opposed to tidal volume based on predicted body weight, is associated with mortality: results from a prospective cohort of COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome patients.

Erich Vidal Carvalho, Maycon Moura Reboredo, Edimar Pedrosa Gomes, Pedro Nascimento Martins, Gabriel Paz Souza Mota, Giovani Bernardo Costa, Fernando Antonio Basile Colugnati, Bruno Valle Pinheiro

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Erich Vidal CarvalhoPulmonary and Critical Care Division, Hospital Universitário, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora - Juiz de Fora (MG), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9860-1474
Maycon Moura ReboredoPulmonary and Critical Care Division, Hospital Universitário, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora - Juiz de Fora (MG), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8155-7414
Edimar Pedrosa GomesPulmonary and Critical Care Division, Hospital Universitário, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora - Juiz de Fora (MG), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2135-3628
Pedro Nascimento MartinsPulmonary and Critical Care Division, Hospital Universitário, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora - Juiz de Fora (MG), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5760-6869
Gabriel Paz Souza MotaPulmonary and Critical Care Division, Hospital Universitário, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora - Juiz de Fora (MG), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6872-1432
Giovani Bernardo CostaPulmonary and Critical Care Division, Hospital Universitário, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora - Juiz de Fora (MG), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7923-9254
Fernando Antonio Basile ColugnatiPulmonary and Critical Care Division, Hospital Universitário, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora - Juiz de Fora (MG), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8288-203X
Bruno Valle PinheiroPulmonary and Critical Care Division, Hospital Universitário, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora - Juiz de Fora (MG), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5288-3533

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the association between driving pressure and tidal volume based on predicted body weight and mortality in a cohort of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by COVID-19.

methodsThis was a prospective, observational study that included patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19 admitted to two intensive care units. We performed multivariable analyses to determine whether driving pressure and tidal volume/kg predicted body weight on the first day of mechanical ventilation, as independent variables, are associated with hospital mortality.

resultsWe included 231 patients. The mean age was 64 (53 - 74) years, and the mean Simplified Acute and Physiology Score 3 score was 45 (39 - 54). The hospital mortality rate was 51.9%. Driving pressure was independently associated with hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.21, 95%CI 1.04 - 1.41 for each cm H2O increase in driving pressure, p = 0.01). Based on a double stratification analysis, we found that for the same level of tidal volume/kg predicted body weight, the risk of hospital death increased with increasing driving pressure. However, changes in tidal volume/kg predicted body weight were not associated with mortality when they did not lead to an increase in driving pressure.

conclusionIn patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by COVID-19, exposure to higher driving pressure, as opposed to higher tidal volume/kg predicted body weight, is associated with greater mortality. These results suggest that driving pressure might be a primary target for lung-protective mechanical ventilation in these patients.

Indexed as

Body WeightCOVID-19Hospital MortalityRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeTidal VolumeAgedFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID38747818
PMCPMC11098065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.