ReviewAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2024
The Management of Mild Pulmonary Hypertension in Clinical Practice.
Review in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing the diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension-a Brazilian perspective aligned with global standards.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2026Article
- Assessment of the Relationship Between the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) With Serum Chloride Level and Mean Pulmonary Arterial Pressure in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.Pulmonary circulation · 2025Article
- The Impact of Cardiac Output Methods on the Classification of Pulmonary Hypertension.Pulmonary circulation · 2025Article
- Beyond the Lung: Viewing Treatment Response through the Liver in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The definition of pulmonary hypertension (PH) has been revised recently, with the mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) threshold (assessed by right heart catheterization) reduced from ⩾25 mm Hg to >20 mm Hg. This change reflects the mPAP upper limit of normal and a lower limit that is independently associated with adverse outcomes. To improve the specificity of diagnosing pathogenic increases in mPAP, however, a diagnosis of precapillary PH now also includes pulmonary vascular resistance >2.0 Wood units (WU) (lowered from >3.0 WU). These changes are positioned to capture approximately 55% more patients with PH. Because all clinical trials showing a benefit of pulmonary vasodilator therapy in precapillary PH used the classical hemodynamic definition, the approach to the diagnosis and management of patients with mild PH (i.e., mPAP 21-24 mm Hg and pulmonary vascular resistance 2-3 WU) requires particular consideration. Here, we use a question/answer format to discuss key areas in the management of mild PH, including practical information tailored to clinicians without training in PH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.