Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38747602›Full record

ArticlemSystems2024

Marta Sudo, Jay Osvatic, John D Taylor, Suzanne C Dufour, Anchana Prathep, Laetitia G E Wilkins, Thomas Rattei, Benedict Yuen, Jillian M Petersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marta SudoUniversity of Vienna, Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4594-995X
Jay OsvaticJoint Microbiome Facility of the Medical University of Vienna and the University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7765-0058
John D TaylorLife Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom.
Suzanne C DufourDepartment of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9179-1319
Anchana PrathepDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, HatYai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-9411-3708
Laetitia G E WilkinsEco-Evolutionary Interactions Group, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3632-2063
Thomas RatteiUniversity of Vienna, Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0592-7791
Benedict Yuen *University of Vienna, Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4979-0862
Jillian M Petersen *University of Vienna, Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9852-3445

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF DOC 69Austrian Science Fund (FWF) DocFunds Grant-DOI 10.55776/DOC69EC | European Research Council (ERC) 802494EC | Horizon Europe | Excellent Science | HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) SEP-210693430University of Vienna 10.55776/COE7Vienna Science and Technology Fund (WWTF) VRG14-021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (SOB) have developed distinct ecological strategies to obtain reduced sulfur compounds for growth. These range from specialists that can only use a limited range of reduced sulfur compounds to generalists that can use many different forms as electron donors. Forming intimate symbioses with animal hosts is another highly successful ecological strategy for SOB, as animals, through their behavior and physiology, can enable access to sulfur compounds. Symbioses have evolved multiple times in a range of animal hosts and from several lineages of SOB. They have successfully colonized a wide range of habitats, from seagrass beds to hydrothermal vents, with varying availability of symbiont energy sources. Our extensive analyses of sulfur transformation pathways in 234 genomes of symbiotic and free-living SOB revealed widespread conservation in metabolic pathways for sulfur oxidation in symbionts from different host species and environments, raising the question of how they have adapted to such a wide range of distinct habitats. We discovered a gene family expansion of

Indexed as

Oxidation-ReductionSulfidesSymbiosisAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBacteriaBacterial ProteinsBivalviaGenome, BacterialHydrothermal VentsMultigene FamilyPhylogenySulfurBacterial ProteinsSulfidesSulfurgene family expansionmetagenomicsmicrobial ecologyphylogenetic analysissulfur metabolismsulfur oxidationsymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID38747602
PMCPMC11237559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.