Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38747258›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Deciphering the chemical language of inbred and wild mouse conspecific scents.

Maximilian Nagel, Marco Niestroj, Rohini Bansal, David Fleck, Angelika Lampert, Romana Stopkova, Pavel Stopka, Yoram Ben-Shaul, Marc Spehr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. CaThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maximilian NagelDepartment of Chemosensation, Institute for Biology II, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Marco NiestrojDepartment of Chemosensation, Institute for Biology II, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Rohini BansalDepartment of Medical Neurobiology, Institute for Medical Research Israel Canada, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
David FleckDepartment of Chemosensation, Institute for Biology II, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6692-2388
Angelika LampertInstitute of Neurophysiology, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6319-6272
Romana StopkovaBIOCEV group, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavel StopkaBIOCEV group, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1104-1655
Yoram Ben-ShaulDepartment of Medical Neurobiology, Institute for Medical Research Israel Canada, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0407-4221
Marc SpehrDepartment of Chemosensation, Institute for Biology II, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6616-4196

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 368482240/GRK2416Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 378028035German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development 1-1193-153.13/2012Volkswagen Foundation I/83533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In most mammals, conspecific chemosensory communication relies on semiochemical release within complex bodily secretions and subsequent stimulus detection by the vomeronasal organ (VNO). Urine, a rich source of ethologically relevant chemosignals, conveys detailed information about sex, social hierarchy, health, and reproductive state, which becomes accessible to a conspecific via vomeronasal sampling. So far, however, numerous aspects of social chemosignaling along the vomeronasal pathway remain unclear. Moreover, since virtually all research on vomeronasal physiology is based on secretions derived from inbred laboratory mice, it remains uncertain whether such stimuli provide a true representation of potentially more relevant cues found in the wild. Here, we combine a robust low-noise VNO activity assay with comparative molecular profiling of sex- and strain-specific mouse urine samples from two inbred laboratory strains as well as from wild mice. With comprehensive molecular portraits of these secretions, VNO activity analysis now enables us to (i) assess whether and, if so, how much sex/strain-selective 'raw' chemical information in urine is accessible via vomeronasal sampling; (ii) identify which chemicals exhibit sufficient discriminatory power to signal an animal's sex, strain, or both; (iii) determine the extent to which wild mouse secretions are unique; and (iv) analyze whether vomeronasal response profiles differ between strains. We report both sex- and, in particular, strain-selective VNO representations of chemical information. Within the urinary 'secretome', both volatile compounds and proteins exhibit sufficient discriminative power to provide sex- and strain-specific molecular fingerprints. While total protein amount is substantially enriched in male urine, females secrete a larger variety at overall comparatively low concentrations. Surprisingly, the molecular spectrum of wild mouse urine does not dramatically exceed that of inbred strains. Finally, vomeronasal response profiles differ between C57BL/6 and BALB/c animals, with particularly disparate representations of female semiochemicals.

Indexed as

Vomeronasal OrganAnimalsFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred StrainsOdorantsPheromonesPheromonesbiochemistrychemical biologychemosensory systemchemosignalingmouseneuroscienceolfactionvomeronasal organvomeronasal sensory neurons

Identifiers

PMID38747258
PMCPMC11095937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.