Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38747193›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2024

Comparison of Tobacco Product Prices at Fort Liberty Army Installation and Surrounding Community Areas, 2021.

Alison M Elliott, Amanda Y Kong, Jared McGuirt, Hannah Prentice-Dunn, Krysta M Gougler-Reeves, Melissa A Little, Kurt M Ribisl

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alison M ElliottDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-7720-9190
Amanda Y KongTSET Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8361-7342
Jared McGuirtDepartment of Nutrition, University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA.
Hannah Prentice-DunnLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Krysta M Gougler-ReevesLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Melissa A LittleDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Kurt M RibislDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

Tissue Pathology Shared ResourceP30CA225520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI ROBERT S. MANNEL · 2018 to 2026
$27.1M
Cancer Health Disparities Training ProgramT32CA128582 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SMITH, JENNIFER SUSAN, TATE, DEBORAH F. · 2009 to 2023
$3.4M
The Determinants of Tobacco Relapse and Initiation Following a Period of Forced Abstinence in the U.S. Military: A Social Ecological ApproachR01DA043468 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI LITTLE, MELISSA ASHLEY · 2018 to 2023
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA225520NCI NIH HHS T32 CA128582NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA043468NIDA NIH HHS R01DA043468NIH HHS P30CA225520Oklahoma Tobacco Settlement Endowment Trust STCST00400_FY24
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHigh rates of tobacco use persist in the U.S. military, with 18.4% of service members smoking cigarettes in 2018. The Department of Defense's (DoD) 2017 policy required that tobacco retailers on military installations set tobacco product prices equal to the most common community price, including tax, but there is limited evidence confirming whether local retailers are adhering to this policy. We examined tobacco product pricing in tobacco retailers on- and off-post at the largest U.S. Army installation, Fort Liberty, and Cumberland County, North Carolina. AIMS AND

methodsBetween June and August 2021, we collected data on tobacco product availability, price, and promotions from retailers on Fort Liberty (n = 14) and a random sample of off-post retailers within 10 miles of installation gates (n = 52). We calculated the mode, mean, and median price of each product, plus the difference in these prices at on- and off-post retailers. We used Welch's t-test to test differences in mean prices between on- versus off-post retailers.

resultsThe mode, mean, and median prices of cigarette packs and cartons were lower on-post than off-post (eg, $0.51-$0.55 cheaper for Marlboro cigarette packs on-post). However, the mode, mean, and median prices of smokeless tobacco products and little cigars were higher on-post than off-post (eg, $0.82-$0.89 more costly for Swisher Sweets 2-packs on-post).

conclusionsResults highlight the need for continued enforcement to ensure compliance with the 2017 DoD policy. Comprehensive policy action to reduce tobacco price disparities on- and off-post is critical to reducing high rates of tobacco use among service members. IMPLICATIONS: Despite the implementation of the 2017 DoD pricing policy, some tobacco products remain cheaper at tobacco retailers on-post compared to off-post retailers. Our results highlight the need for greater routine surveillance to increase implementation of the policy-particularly for cigarettes-to reduce high rates of tobacco use among service members.

Indexed as

CommerceTobacco ProductsHumansMilitary FacilitiesMilitary PersonnelNorth CarolinaTaxesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID38747193
PMCPMC11494477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.