Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38747173›Full record

SynthesisUnited European gastroenterology journal2024

Adverse events with endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy for gastric outlet obstruction-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Suprabhat Giri, Sidharth Harindranath, Babu P Mohan, Vaneet Jearth, Jijo Varghese, Marko Kozyk, Aditya Kale, Sridhar Sundaram

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in United European gastroenterology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Updated Classification of EUS-Guided Gastroenterostomy Misdeployment.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026
    Review
  3. EUS-Guided Gastroenterostomy for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction: Morphological Classification to Prevent Stent Misdeployment.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026
    Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Suprabhat GiriDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9626-5243
Sidharth HarindranathDepartment of Gastroenterology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Babu P MohanOrlando Gastroenterology PA, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Vaneet JearthDepartment of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Jijo VargheseDepartment of Gastroenterology, NS Hospital, Kollam, India.
Marko KozykDepartment of Internal Medicine, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA.
Aditya KaleDepartment of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Mumbai, India.
Sridhar SundaramDepartment of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe technical and clinical effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided gastroenterostomy (GE) has been reported by several meta-analyses, but few of them have addressed the adverse events (AE). The goal of the current meta-analysis was to analyze the AEs associated with various types of EUS-GE.

methodsAll relevant studies reporting the AEs with EUS-GE were searched from 2000 to 31st March 2023 in MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus. The event rates were pooled using a random effects model.

resultsA total of 36 studies (n = 1846) were included in the meta-analysis. The present meta-analysis reports a pooled technical success rate of 96.9% (95.9-98.0; I

conclusionDespite a technical and clinical success rate of >90%, AEs are seen in around one-seventh of the cases of EUS-GE, maldeployment being the commonest. However, the pooled incidence of serious AE and mortality remains low, which is reassuring.

Indexed as

EndosonographyGastric Outlet ObstructionGastroenterostomyStentsUltrasonography, InterventionalHumansPostoperative ComplicationsTreatment Outcomeendoscopic ultrasoundgastric outlet obstructiongastroenterostomygastrojejunostomymeta‐analysis

Identifiers

PMID38747173
PMCPMC11497769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.