Observational studyBJS open2024
Operative management of primary hyperparathyroidism in Europe.
Observational study in BJS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgery versus observation in patients 65 years or older with primary hyperparathyroidism: randomized clinical trial.BJS open · 2026Trial
- Association Between Biochemical Parameters, Parathyroid Gland Morphometry, and Dual-Phase MIBI SPECT/CT Findings in Primary Hyperparathyroidism.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMulticentre studies have previously reported on national outcomes of surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism, but not investigated whether management and outcome are uniform among countries. This study investigated whether there are differences among European countries in operative management and outcome of surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism.
methodsUsing data from Eurocrine®, a pan-European registry for endocrine surgeries, a retrospective observational cross-sectional multicentre study with 99 participating centres in 14 European countries was performed. Data on age, sex, calcium levels, operative strategy, conversion rate and rate of failed exploration were analysed for patients who underwent initial surgery for sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism. Primary outcome measures were intention to perform limited parathyroidectomy and the rate of hypercalcaemia at first follow-up.
resultsA total of 9548 patients were registered between 2015 and 2020. There were 7642 (80%, range 74.5-93.2%) females. There was intention to perform limited parathyroidectomy in 7320 of 9548 (76.7%) operations, ranging from 498 of 1007 (49.5%) to 40 of 41 (97.6%) among countries. Hypercalcaemia at first follow-up (median time to follow-up 15 days) was found in 416 of 9548 (4.4%) operations, ranging from 0 of 119 (0%) to 3 of 38 (7.9%) among countries.
conclusionThis study demonstrated large differences in the intention to perform limited parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism among European countries, as well as differences in the rate of postoperative hypercalcaemia. Future studies are needed to evaluate the impact of these different healthcare practices on patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.