Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38746730›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2021

Goal attainment scaling with older people in general practice: A feasibility study.

Sophie Ce van Blijswijk, Jacobijn Gussekloo, Florentine M Heijmans, Annet W Wind, Wendy Pj den Elzen, Jeanet W Blom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sophie Ce van BlijswijkDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Hippocratespad 21, Postzone V0-P, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands.
Jacobijn GusseklooDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Hippocratespad 21, Postzone V0-P, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands.
Florentine M HeijmansDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Hippocratespad 21, Postzone V0-P, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands.
Annet W WindDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Hippocratespad 21, Postzone V0-P, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands.
Wendy Pj den ElzenDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Hippocratespad 21, Postzone V0-P, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands.
Jeanet W BlomDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Hippocratespad 21, Postzone V0-P, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The impact of health problems on daily life and consequent treatment goals differ from person to person, particularly for older people with multiple health problems. Personalized care in general practice can help address these health problems, but evaluation of its effects remains difficult. In rehabilitation, a common approach to the evaluation of personalized care is Goal Attainment Scaling. This feasibility study assesses whether goal attainment scaling can also be applied to the evaluation of personal care for community-dwelling older people in general practice. Methods: General practices were invited to participate in this longitudinal, observational feasibility study. Practice nurses and general practitioners received training in care plans and goal attainment scaling. They were each asked to create care plans and goal attainment scales for patients (aged ≥75 years) and to carry out evaluations at three and six months. Professionals and patients both completed a short questionnaire to evaluate their experiences regarding the (dis)advantages of goal attainment scaling. Results: Professionals ( Conclusions: Goal attainment scaling shows potential benefit for clinical practice and general practice research in terms of the setting and evaluation of goals for community-dwelling older persons. Further research is needed to develop more standardized and less time-consuming goal attainment scaling methods.

Indexed as

Care-action-planCommunity-dwelling older peopleEvaluation methodGeneral practiceGoal attainment scalingGoal settingIndividualised carePersonalised carePractice nursesPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID38746730
PMCPMC11080302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.