Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38746725›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2021

A comparison of occupational physical activity and sedentary behavior patterns of nurses working 12-h day and night shifts.

R M Benzo, A Farag, K M Whitaker, Q Xiao, L J Carr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. An exploration of New Zealand mental health nurses' personal physical activities.International journal of mental health nursing · 2022
    Article
  19. Insomnia Prevalence among Italian Night-Shift Nurses.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R M BenzoDepartment of Health & Human Physiology, University of Iowa, E102 Field House, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.
A FaragCollege of Nursing, University of Iowa, 444 College of nursing building, 50 Newton Rd, Iowa City IA 52242, United States.
K M WhitakerDepartment of Health & Human Physiology, University of Iowa, E102 Field House, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.
Q XiaoDepartment of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
L J CarrDepartment of Health & Human Physiology, University of Iowa, E102 Field House, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Past studies have reported nurses working day shifts engage in high amounts of light and moderate-intensity occupational physical activity. However, little is known regarding how occupational physical activity and sedentary behavior is accumulated within shifts and/or over consecutive shifts. Objective: This study compared occupational physical activity and sedentary behavior patterns of nurses working 12-h. day vs. 12 -h. night shifts. We hypothesized nurses working day shifts would be more active and less sedentary while at work compared to nurses working night shifts and that within shift and between shift differences would emerge. Design: Prospective-cohort study design. Settings: Midwestern trauma one academic medical center medical units (medical surgical, critical care, pediatrics, mother and baby, and other). Participants: A total of 56 registered nurses working 12-h. day and night shifts participated in this study. Methods: Occupational physical activity and sedentary behaviors (e.g., step count, time spent sitting, standing, and walking) were measured for 14 continuous days using the ActivPAL 3 micro activity monitor. Repeated measures mixed-effects regression models were used to examine the effects of shift type, consecutive shifts, and time within a shift on occupational physical activity and sedentary behaviors. Results: Nurses spent more time standing and walking, and less time sitting overall during day shifts compared to night shifts. Nurses walked less during the third consecutive night shift and stood less and sat more during the second and third consecutive night shifts, compared to day shifts. Nurses tended to walk less and sit more during the middle portion of each night shift compared to day shifts. Conclusions: Our findings suggest nurses spend more than half of each shift either standing or walking and that differential patterns of occupational physical activity and sedentary behavior exist between day and night shifts. These findings should be used to inform future interventions designed to advance the health and work performance of nurses.

Indexed as

AccelerometryNursingOccupational health nursingPhysical exertionSedentary behaviorShift work schedule

Identifiers

PMID38746725
PMCPMC11080359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.