Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38746724›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2021

Acceptance of care technologies to support activities of daily living by middle-aged and older adults in Japan: A cross-sectional study.

Sakiko Itoh, Hiroyasu Miwa, Vivien Xi Wu, Ayako Okuyama, Kentaro Watanabe, Tomoko Ikeuchi, Tomoko Wakui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sakiko ItohDepartment of Genome Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Hiroyasu MiwaService Value Augmentation Research Team, Human Augmentation Research Center, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 6-2-3 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-0882, Japan.
Vivien Xi WuAlice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, level 2, 10 Medical Drive, 117597, Singapore.
Ayako OkuyamaNational Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Kentaro WatanabeService Value Augmentation Research Team, Human Augmentation Research Center, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 6-2-3 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-0882, Japan.
Tomoko IkeuchiHuman Care Research Team, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, 35-2 Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo 173-0015, Japan.
Tomoko WakuiHuman Care Research Team, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, 35-2 Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo 173-0015, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Various technologies to provide long-term care have been developed in the last decade due to the shortage of caregivers in Japan. However, care technologies are not widely used in long-term care, and the reasons for the lack of acceptance of care technologies are poorly understood. Objectives: To identify the factors associated with the acceptance of care technologies designed to assist with activities of daily living (i.e., bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, and eating) among middle-aged and older adults in Japan. Design and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in August 2020. The target population was middle-aged and older adults (i.e., 40-79 years) in Japan. We used an online questionnaire platform of a research company to target people throughout Japan, and measured the acceptance of care technologies to support the performance of each of five activities of daily living. Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to identify the associated factors using the bivariate variable "willingness to use care technologies for activities of daily living" as the dependent variable. Results: A total of 3261 eligible respondents were included in the analysis. The factors positively associated with the acceptance of care technologies for transferring, which had the highest level of acceptance, were female sex (adjusted odds ratio=1.25, 95% CI: 1.04-1.52), university or higher education level (1.73, 1.41-2.12), an annual income of 39000 to 58999 USD (1.47, 1.08-2.01) or greater than 99,000 USD (1.88, 1.21-2.94), experience as an informal caregiver (1.25, 1.02-1.54), the use of social networking services a few times per year (1.40, 1.11-1.78) or nearly every day (1.47, 1.19-1.82), and willingness to live in a nursing home when care is needed (1.29, 1.05-1.60). In contrast, aged 70-79 years was negatively associated with the acceptance of care technologies for transferring (0.70, 0.52-0.93). Conclusion: Female sex, university or higher education level, an annual income greater than 99,000 USD, the use of social networking services a few times per year or more often, and willingness to live in a nursing home when care is needed were positively associated with the acceptance of care technologies for multiple activities of daily living. Given that many of the respondents will need care in 5-10 years, the acceptance of care technologies among those who need care will increase. Therefore, governments and developers of care technologies could consider the potential needs of this population group.

Indexed as

Activities of daily livingAssisted living facilitiesCaregiversHome care servicesIndependent livingLong-term careNursing homesTechnology

Identifiers

PMID38746724
PMCPMC11080438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.