ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2021
Comparison of the international Burn Injury Database nurse dependency tool with the Safer Nursing Care Tool: Observational study.
Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Safe and effective nurse staffing is widely recognised as an important issue to ensure quality patient care and reduce mortality. There are many nurse dependency tools described in the literature but no gold standard tool that can be used in all specialities. In burn care there are even fewer burn specific tools and none reported for use in the UK to date. The international Burn Injury Database contains routinely collected information about burn injuries, including nurse dependency data which so far has not been reported in the literature. Objective: This study aimed to confirm whether the international Burn Injury Database nurse dependency tool can be used to measure nurse dependency in burn services. Methods: Over a two week period, nurses in three burn services scored the nurse dependency of their burn injured patients daily using the international Burn Injury Database Nurse Dependency Tool and the Safer Nursing Care Tool. Additionally all the participating nurses were asked to score three fictional case studies using the same two tools to assess inter-rater reliability. Results: There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the international Burn Injury Database Nurse Dependency Tool and the Safer Nursing Care Tool scores (ρ = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.82-0.90). The case study scores showed a similar correlation pattern as the daily comparison recordings. The inter-rater reliability between the participants was comparable for both the international Burn Injury Database Nurse Dependency Tool (α =0.74, CI = 0.71-0.77) and the Safer Nursing Care Tool (α =0.79, CI = 0.76-0.81). Psychological support variable had the weakest correlation with the nurse dependency tools and the lowest agreement between nurses. Conclusion: This is the first report in the literature of the international Burn Injury Database Nurse Dependency Tool, the results of which suggest that it does measure aspects of nurse dependency and thus could be a valuable tool in the battle to ensure safe staffing. The good inter-rater reliability between the nurses, regardless of the nurse dependency tool used, should give confidence to nurses and managers using the dependency data to influence staffing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.