Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38746720›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2021

Older adult and family caregiver preferences for emergency department based-palliative care: An experience-based co-design study.

Rebecca Wright, Karen Lowton, Bryan R Hansen, Patricia Grocott

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Improving prehospital and emergency care for patients with mental dysregulation: a comprehensive research agenda.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Mapping the future for research in emergency medicine palliative care: A research roadmap.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebecca WrightJCMB, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, 57 Waterloo Road, London SE1 8WA, UK.
Karen LowtonDepartment of Sociology, University of Sussex, Freeman Building, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9RH, UK.
Bryan R HansenJohns Hopkins School of Nursing, 525 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Patricia GrocottFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, JCMB, 57 Waterloo Road, London SE1 8WA, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Older adults (>65 years) with palliative care needs are increasingly accessing the emergency department. Some interventions have been developed to improve the care provided, but the majority of research has focused on provider perspectives. Limited understanding of patient and family experiences and priorities means important needs may be overlooked. Objectives: To explore patient and family caregiver experiences and identify their improvement priorities for emergency department-based palliative care delivery. Design: A participatory action research design, experienced-based co-design, was adopted. Filmed and audio-recorded interviews and individual feedback sessions were used to capture patient data. Setting: An urban emergency department in the UK. Participants: Six patients aged ≥65 with palliative care needs and four family caregivers were recruited from the emergency department. Methods: Participants took part in individual or dyad audio-recorded or filmed interviews. Interview data were analyzed using thematic framework analysis. One-to-one feedback sessions with participants were used to validate findings and rank the themes to identify patient and family priorities for improvement. Results: The analysis identified five prominent themes that captured the patient and family experience of emergency department-based palliative care. 1) Systems and processes; 2) communication and information; 3) changing expectations (of what can be done for one's health on a personal and system level); 4) recommendations (for improving palliative care in the emergency department); and, 5) acknowledgement and validation (of the patient and family). All themes except 'recommendations' were selected as improvement priorities. Within the context of these improvement priorities, participants provided rich insights into their perceptions of care and identified small but significant actions that could be implemented to improve their experiences of palliative care in the emergency department. These included being offered a drink or phone call, being included in conversations about their care, and being kept informed of what was happening with their care. Conclusions: Older people with palliative care needs and their family caregivers were able to share their experiences and highlight improvement priorities for emergency department care using the experience-based co-design approach. Their experiences offer new perspectives, which can be used alongside emergency department and palliative care clinician perspectives to support service and outcome measure development in future emergency department-based palliative care. Tweetable abstract: #EBCD study shows older adults with #PalliativeCare needs value communication, compassion & inclusion in #SharedDecisionMaking in the #ED.

Indexed as

Emergency departmentExperience-based Co-designFamily caregiver experienceOlder peoplePalliative carePatient experienceQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID38746720
PMCPMC11080348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.