Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38746647›Full record

ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2024

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer: Improving treatment delivery efficiency and accuracy.

Edoardo Mastella, Joel E Epile, Eleonora De Guglielmo, Sara Fabbri, Francesca Calderoni, Luigi Manco, Klarisa E Szilagyi, Antonio Malorgio, Alessandro Turra, Antonio Stefanelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Edoardo MastellaMedical Physics Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, via A. Moro 8, I-44124 Cona (Ferrara), Italy.
Joel E EpileMaster of Advanced Studies in Medical Physics, International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP), Strada Costiera 11, I-34151 Trieste, Italy.
Eleonora De GuglielmoMedical Physics Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, via A. Moro 8, I-44124 Cona (Ferrara), Italy.
Sara FabbriMedical Physics Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, via A. Moro 8, I-44124 Cona (Ferrara), Italy.
Francesca CalderoniMedical Physics Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, via A. Moro 8, I-44124 Cona (Ferrara), Italy.
Luigi MancoMedical Physics Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, via A. Moro 8, I-44124 Cona (Ferrara), Italy.
Klarisa E SzilagyiSpecialization School of Medical Physics, University of Bologna, Viale Berti-Pichat 6/2, I-40127 Bologna, Italy.
Antonio MalorgioRadiation Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, via A. Moro 8, I-44124 Cona (Ferrara), Italy.
Alessandro TurraMedical Physics Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, via A. Moro 8, I-44124 Cona (Ferrara), Italy.
Antonio StefanelliRadiation Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, via A. Moro 8, I-44124 Cona (Ferrara), Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: In stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer, intrafraction motion is an important source of treatment uncertainty as it could not be completely smoothed through fractionation. Herein, we compared different arrangements and beam qualities for extreme hypofractionated treatments to minimize beam delivery time and so intrafractional errors. Methods: A retrospective dataset of 11 patients was used. Three volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) beam arrangements were compared for a prescription dose of 40 Gy/5 fractions: two full arcs, 6 MV flattening filter free (FFF); one full arc, 6 MV FFF; one full arc, 10 MV FFF. A plan quality index was defined to compare achievement of the planning goals. Plan complexity was evaluated with the modulation factor. Dose delivery accuracy and efficiency were measured with patient-specific quality assurance plans. Results: All treatment plans fulfilled all dose objectives. No statistical differences were found both in plan quality and complexity. Very accurate dose delivery was achieved with the three arrangements, with mean γ passing rates >96.5 % (2 %/2 mm criteria). Slightly but significantly higher γ passing rates were observed with single-arc 6 MV FFF. Contrariwise, statistically significant reductions of the delivery time were obtained with single-arc geometries: the average delivery times were 1.6 min (-46.1 %) and 1.3 min (-56.2 %) for 6 and 10 MV FFF respectively. Conclusions: The high-quality, very fast and accurate dose delivery of single-arc plans confirmed the suitability of this arrangement for prostate SBRT. In particular, the significant reduction of delivery time would improve treatment robustness against intrafraction prostate motion.

Indexed as

Flattening filter free (FFF) beamIntrafraction motion mitigationPatient specific quality assurance (PSQA)Single arcUltra-hypofractionationVolumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)

Identifiers

PMID38746647
PMCPMC11090872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.