Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38746594›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2023

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on nursing students' navigation of their nursing programmes and experiences of resilience. A qualitative study.

Catherine Henshall, Zoe Davey, Clair Merriman, Laura Strumidlo, Laura Serrant, Jo Brett, Eila Watson, Jane V Appleton, Mary Malone, COV-ED Nurse Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. From crisis to commitment: nursing students' sense of belonging during and immediately after the covid-19 pandemic.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Catherine HenshallOxford Institute of Applied Health Research, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Zoe DaveyOxford Institute of Applied Health Research, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Clair MerrimanOxford Institute of Applied Health Research, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Laura StrumidloUniversity of Coventry, Coventry, UK.
Laura SerrantHealth Education England (North East & Yorkshire), Sheffield, UK.
Jo BrettOxford Institute of Applied Health Research, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Eila WatsonOxford Institute of Applied Health Research, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Jane V AppletonOxford Institute of Applied Health Research, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Mary MaloneKings College London, London, UK.
COV-ED Nurse Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: High-quality pre-registration student nurse training and development is integral to developing a sustainable and competent global nursing workforce. Internationally, student nurse recruitment rates have increased since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic; however, attrition rates for student nurses are high. During the pandemic, many student nurses considered leaving the programme due to academic concerns, feeling overwhelmed, and doubting their clinical skills. Little was known about the extent to which nursing education prior to COVID-19 had prepared students for their role in managing the healthcare crisis or the impact on their resilience. Thus, this study aimed to explore how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted on the resilience levels of student nurses across the United Kingdom. Methods: Data were collected as part of a multi-site qualitative study named 'COV-ED Nurse' and involved pre-placement surveys, placement diaries, and post-placement interviews with nursing students. Student nurse participants were recruited from across the United Kingdom, from all years of study, and from all four nursing branches: children, adult, mental health, and learning disabilities. Participants were asked to complete a pre-placement survey that collected demographic details and information about their placement expectations. They were also asked to record a weekly audio-visual or written diary to describe their placement experiences, and, on completion of their placements, students were interviewed to explore their experiences of this time. Data were thematically analysed using the Framework Approach. Ethical approvals were obtained. Results: Two hundred and sixteen students took part in the wider study. The current study involved a subset of 59 students' data. Four main themes were identified: 'coping with increased levels of acuity', 'perceived risks of the pandemic', 'resilience when facing uncertainty and isolation', and 'the importance of coping mechanisms and support structures.' Discussion: From this study, we have generated insights that can be applied to nursing research, education, policy, and practice and identified the wide-ranging impact that the COVID-19 pandemic had on student nurses and their abilities to remain resilient in an unstable environment. The value of communication and support networks from a wide range of sources was highlighted as key to navigating many uncertainties. In addition, the extent to which students were able to navigate their personal and professional roles and identities influenced their ability to cope with and continue along their training pathways.

Indexed as

Nurse educationNursingQualitativeResilienceStudentsSupport networksTraining

Identifiers

PMID38746594
PMCPMC11080317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.