Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38746572›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2023

The Nurse Perceived Adequacy of Staffing Scale for general hospital wards: A development and psychometric validation study.

Carmen van der Mark, Justin Bitter, Paul H J Hendriks, Hester Vermeulen, Catharina J van Oostveen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Enhancing Nursing Excellence: Exploring the Relationship between Nurse Deployment and Performance.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carmen van der MarkRijnstate Hospital, Department of Capacity Management, P.O. Box 9555, 6815 AD, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
Justin BitterDepartment of Medical Support, VieCuri Medical Center, P.O. Box 1926, 5912 BL, Venlo, the Netherlands.
Paul H J HendriksInstitute for Management Research, Radboud University, P.O. Box 9102, 6500 HC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Hester VermeulenRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboudumc, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Catharina J van OostveenErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, Campus Woudestein, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adequate staffing is crucial for high quality patient care and nurses' wellbeing. Nurses' professional assessment on adequacy of staffing is the gold standard in measuring staffing adequacy. However, available measurement instruments lack reliability and validity. Objectives: To develop and psychometrically test an instrument to measure nurses' perceived adequacy of staffing (PAS) of general hospital wards. Design: A multicenter cross-sectional psychometric instrument development and validation study using item response theory. Settings: Ten general nursing wards in three teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Participants: A sample of 881 participants, including third and fourth year nursing students and nurse/care assistants. Methods: The 13-item self-reported questionnaire was developed based on a previous Delphi study and two focus groups. We interviewed five nurses to evaluate the content validity of the instrument. The field test for psychometric evaluation was conducted on ten general wards of three teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Structural validity of the item bank was examined by fitting a graded response model (GRM) and inspecting GRM fit. Measurement invariance was assessed by evaluating differential item functioning (DIF) of education level and work experience. We examined convergent validity by testing the hypothesis that there was at least a moderate correlation between the PAS instrument and a single item measuring adequacy of staffing. Internal consistency and reliability across the scale were also examined. Results: A total of 881 measurements were included in the analysis. The data fitted the GRM adequately and item fit statistics were good. DIF was detected for work experience for the protocols item, but the impact on total scores was negligible. The hypothesis was confirmed and the item bank reliably measured two standard deviations around the mean. Conclusions: The Nurse Perceived Adequacy of Staffing Scale (NPASS) for nurses of general hospital wards in the Netherlands has sufficient reliability and validity and is ready for use in nurse staffing research and practice.

Indexed as

InstrumentsNurse staffingPerceptionsPersonnel staffing and schedulingPsychometric propertiesStaffing adequacyWorkforce planning

Identifiers

PMID38746572
PMCPMC11080495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.