Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38746565›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2023

Effects of nurse delivered thoracic ultrasound on management of adult intensive care unit patients: A prospective observational study.

Thomas Smits, Micah Heldeweg, Amy Morreale Tulleken, Brian Verlaan, Lonneke Floor, Alwin Eijsenga, Erik Lust, Harry Gelissen, Armand Girbes, Paul Elbers and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Thomas SmitsDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Micah HeldewegDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amy Morreale TullekenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Brian VerlaanDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Lonneke FloorDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Alwin EijsengaDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Erik LustDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Harry GelissenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Armand GirbesDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Paul ElbersDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Pieter Roel TuinmanDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Thoracic ultrasound is a valuable tool that helps diagnose cardiopulmonary disorders and guide management in intensive care unit patients. Intensive care unit nurses were trained to perform thoracic ultrasound examinations, after which they were named 'UltraNurses' for clinical recognizability. UltraNurses demonstrated rapid learning trajectories, but the impact on clinical-decision making remained unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of UltraNurse ultrasound on clinical management. Methods: This was a prospective observational single center study within a mixed medical and surgical intensive care unit. All adult patients with an indication for UltraNurse thoracic ultrasound were included. The study consisted of three steps: pre- and post- data collection, with the ultrasound examination conducted in-between these two steps. The examination consisted of a standardized ultrasound protocol aimed at the lungs and cardiac output. Primary outcome was what percentage of ultrasounds led to a change of management. Secondary outcomes included: percentage of changes executed within first 8 hours, frequency of pathology found, percentage of diagnosis change, and frequency of UltraNurse ultrasounds per shift. Results: A total of 102 ultrasound examinations were performed in 65 patients (89% mechanically-ventilated). Ultrasound examinations suggested changes of management in 26% of cases, of which 96% were executed within 8 hours. Most changes were within the nursing scope (56%), specifically: 44% of examinations changed fluid management. UltraNurse ultrasound detected pathology in 97% of cases. In 7% of cases, the diagnosis was changed, sometimes leading to life-saving interventions. UltraNurses performed one thoracic ultrasound examination per four shifts. Conclusion: In adult intensive care unit patients, UltraNurse thoracic ultrasound led to a change of management in more than a quarter of the cases, of which almost all were executed within the first 8 hours. Study registration: Netherlands Trial Registration NL9047, VUmc 2020.011 (prospectively registered on: 13-11-2020).

Indexed as

Cardiac outputCritical care nursingHeartLungObservational studyTherapeuticsThoraxUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID38746565
PMCPMC11080432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.