Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38746557›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nursing studies advances2023

Experiences of nurses and midwives in policy development in low- and middle-income countries: Qualitative systematic review.

Josephine Etowa, Adele Vukic, Megan Aston, Damilola Iduye, Shelley Mckibbon, Awoala George, Chioma Nkwocha, Binita Thapa, Getachew Abrha, Justine Dol

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Producing Mobility, Withholding Authority: Epistemic Drain and Nursing Sovereignty in Nepal.Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Josephine EtowaSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Canada.
Adele VukicSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Canada.
Megan AstonSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Canada.
Damilola IduyeSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Canada.
Shelley MckibbonLibrarian, WK Kellogg Health Sciences Library, Dalhousie University, Canada.
Awoala GeorgeDepartment of Nursing Science, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.
Chioma NkwochaDepartment of Nursing Science, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.
Binita ThapaSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Canada.
Getachew AbrhaSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Canada.
Justine DolSt. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nurses provide 90% of health care worldwide, yet little is known of the experiences of nurses and midwives in policy development in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Objective: To identify, appraise and synthesize the qualitative evidence on the experiences of nurses' and midwives' involvement in policy development LMICs. Design: A qualitative systematic review using modified Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. Setting: Low and middle-income countries Participants: Nurses' and midwives' involved in policy development, implementation, and/or evaluation. Methods: A systematic search was undertaken across nine databases to retrieve published studies in English between inception and April of 2021. Screening, critical appraisal, and data extraction was undertaken by two independent reviewers. Results: Ten articles met inclusion criteria. All studies were published between 2000 to 2021 from a variety of LMICs. The studies were medium to high quality (70-100% critical appraisal scores). Four major themes were identified related to policy development: 1) Marginal representation of nurses; 2) Determinants of nurses' involvement (including at the individual, organization, and systematic level); 3) Leadership as a pathway to involvement; 4) Promoting nurses' involvement. Conclusion: All studies demonstrated that nurses and nurse midwives continue to be minimally involved in policy development. Findings reveal reasons for nurses' limited involvement and strategies to foster sustained engagement of nurses in policy development in LMICs. To enhance their involvement in policy development in LMICs, change is needed at multiple levels. Systemic power relations need to be reconstructed to facilitate more collaborative interdisciplinary practices with nurses co-leading and co-developing health care policies.

Indexed as

HealthcareInvolvementLow- and middle-income countriesMidwivesNursesPolicy development

Identifiers

PMID38746557
PMCPMC11080334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.