Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38746511›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurosciences in rural practice

Use of cannabidiol in the treatment of drug-refractory epilepsy in children and young adults: A systematic review.

Samuel Fernando Vargas Chico, Daniel Alejandro Melendez Diaz, Neyder Contreras-Puentes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurosciences in rural practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samuel Fernando Vargas ChicoDepartment of Medicine, Rafael Nuñez University Corporation, Cartagena, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7487-1056
Daniel Alejandro Melendez DiazDepartment of Medicine, Rafael Nuñez University Corporation, Cartagena, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2214-1925
Neyder Contreras-PuentesDepartment of Medicine, Rafael Nuñez University Corporation, Cartagena, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0974-8894

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Epilepsy poses a significant challenge in pediatric and adolescent populations, impacting not only seizures but also psychological and cognitive comorbidities, leading to higher mortality rates than the general population. Drug-refractory epilepsy, resistant to conventional treatments, affects a range of 7-20% of pediatric patients. The search for alternative therapies has led to exploring the therapeutic potential of Materials and Methods: A systematic review, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, assessed studies from 2018 to 2023, focusing on CBD's efficacy and safety for treatment-resistant epilepsy in pediatric and juvenile populations. The search spanned seven databases, and the studies underwent rigorous screening and data extraction. Results: Out of 6351 identified articles, eight were selected for review. The included studies reported positive outcomes, with CBD leading to a reduction in seizure frequency ranging from 50% to complete seizure freedom. Adverse effects were mostly mild and reversible, including drowsiness, diarrhea, and loss of appetite. Conclusion: The CBD emerges as a promising tool for refractory epilepsy in pediatric patients, showing efficacy in reducing seizure frequency and improving overall quality of life. Despite mild and reversible adverse effects, CBD's benefits outweigh the risks. However, more research on long-term effects is needed to fully understand its implications.

Indexed as

CannabidiolCannabisChildrenRefractory epilepsyYoung

Identifiers

PMID38746511
PMCPMC11090527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.