Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38746499›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurosciences in rural practice

Assessment of memory deficits in psychiatric disorders: A systematic literature review.

Anuradha Kushwaha, Devendra Singh Basera, Sangita Kumari, Roshan Fakirchand Sutar, Vijender Singh, Saikat Das, Amit Agrawal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurosciences in rural practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Dynamic Testing in a Heterogeneous Clinical Sample: A Feasibility Study.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anuradha KushwahaDepartment of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Devendra Singh BaseraDepartment of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6077-8779
Sangita KumariDepartment of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Roshan Fakirchand SutarDepartment of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1027-1659
Vijender SinghDepartment of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Saikat DasDepartment of Radiotherapy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Amit AgrawalDepartment of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memory deficits are observed across psychiatric disorders ranging from the prodrome of psychosis to common mental disorders such as anxiety, depression, and dissociative disorders. Memory deficits among patients recovering from psychiatric disorders could be directly related to the primary illness or secondary to the adverse effect of a treatment such as Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT). The trouble in the meaningful integration of working-memory and episodic memory is the most commonly affected domain that requires routine assessments. An update on the recent trends of methods of assessment of memory deficits is the first step towards understanding and correcting these deficits to target optimum recovery. A systematic literature search was conducted from October 2018 to October 2022 to review the recent methods of assessment of memory deficits in psychiatric disorders. The definition of 'Memory deficit' was operationalized as 'selective processes of memory, commonly required for activities of daily living, and affected among psychiatric disorders resulting in subjective distress and dysfunction'. We included 110 studies, most of them being conducted in western countries on patients with schizophrenia. Other disorders included dementia and mild cognitive impairment. Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia, Cambridge Automated Neuropsychological Test Battery, California Verbal Learning Test, Trail Making Test Part A and B, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Wechsler Memory Scale, Wechsler Adults Intelligence Scale-IV were the most common neuropsychological assessments used. Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment were the most common bedside assessment tools used while Squire Subjective Memory Questionnaire was commonly used to measure ECT-related memory deficits. The review highlights the recent developments in the field of assessment of memory deficits in psychiatric disorders. Findings recommend and emphasize routine assessment of memory deficits among psychiatric disorders in developing countries especially severe mental illnesses. It remains interesting to see the role of standardized assessments in diagnostic systems given more than a decade of research on memory deficits in psychiatric disorders.

Indexed as

AssessmentCognitiveMemory deficitsNeuropsychological assessmentpsychiatryRecent memoryWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID38746499
PMCPMC11090569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.