ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024
An Anthropomorphic Diagnosis System of Pulmonary Nodules using Weak Annotation-Based Deep Learning.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop an anthropomorphic diagnosis system of pulmonary nodules (PN) based on Deep learning (DL) that is trained by weak annotation data and has comparable performance to full-annotation based diagnosis systems. Methods: The proposed system uses deep learning (DL) models to classify PNs (benign vs. malignant) with weak annotations, which eliminates the need for time-consuming and labor-intensive manual annotations of PNs. Moreover, the PN classification networks, augmented with handcrafted shape features acquired through the ball-scale transform technique, demonstrate capability to differentiate PNs with diverse labels, including pure ground-glass opacities, part-solid nodules, and solid nodules. Results: The experiments were conducted on two lung CT datasets: (1) public LIDC-IDRI dataset with 1,018 subjects, (2) In-house dataset with 2740 subjects. Through 5-fold cross-validation on two datasets, the system achieved the following results: (1) an Area Under Curve (AUC) of 0.938 for PN localization and an AUC of 0.912 for PN differential diagnosis on the LIDC-IDRI dataset of 814 testing cases, (2) an AUC of 0.943 for PN localization and an AUC of 0.815 for PN differential diagnosis on the in-house dataset of 822 testing cases. These results demonstrate comparable performance to full annotation-based diagnosis systems. Conclusions: Our system can efficiently localize and differentially diagnose PNs even in resource-limited environments with good robustness across different grade and morphology sub-groups in the presence of deviations due to the size, shape, and texture of the nodule, indicating its potential for future clinical translation. Summary: An anthropomorphic diagnosis system of pulmonary nodules (PN) based on deep learning and weak annotation was found to achieve comparable performance to full-annotation dataset-based diagnosis systems, significantly reducing the time and the cost associated with the annotation. Key Points: A fully automatic system for the diagnosis of PN in CT scans using a suitable deep learning model and weak annotations was developed to achieve comparable performance (AUC = 0.938 for PN localization, AUC = 0.912 for PN differential diagnosis) with the full-annotation based deep learning models, reducing around 30%∼80% of annotation time for the experts.The integration of the hand-crafted feature acquired from human experts (natural intelligence) into the deep learning networks and the fusion of the classification results of multi-scale networks can efficiently improve the PN classification performance across different diameters and sub-groups of the nodule.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.