Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38746391›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

CAIM: Coverage-based Analysis for Identification of Microbiome.

Daniel A Acheampong, Piroon Jenjaroenpun, Thidathip Wongsurawat, Alongkorn Krulilung, Yotsawat Pomyen, Sangam Kandel, Pattapon Kunadirek, Natthaya Chuaypen, Kanthida Kusonmano, Intawat Nookaew

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniel A AcheampongDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Piroon JenjaroenpunDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Thidathip WongsurawatDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Alongkorn KrulilungDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Yotsawat PomyenTranslational Research Unit, Chulabhorn Research Institute, Bangkok, 10210, Thailand.
Sangam KandelDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Pattapon KunadirekCenter of Excellence in Hepatitis and Liver Cancer, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Natthaya ChuaypenCenter of Excellence in Hepatitis and Liver Cancer, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kanthida KusonmanoBioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, School of Bioresources and Technology, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, 10150, Thailand.
Intawat NookaewDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8901-1088

Funding

Understanding the Negative Prognostic Impact of Intraosseous Focal Lesions in Multiple MyelomaP20GM125503 · NIGMS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI CHARLES A O'BRIEN · 2018 to 2026
$23.0M
Understanding and Enhancing T-Cell Responses to High Risk Human Papillomaviruses-RenewalR01CA143130 · NCI · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI NAKAGAWA, MAYUMI · 2010 to 2025
$10.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA143130NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM125503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate taxonomic profiling of microbial taxa in a metagenomic sample is vital to gain insights into microbial ecology. Recent advancements in sequencing technologies have contributed tremendously toward understanding these microbes at species resolution through a whole shotgun metagenomic (WMS) approach. In this study, we developed a new bioinformatics tool, CAIM, for accurate taxonomic classification and quantification within both long- and short-read metagenomic samples using an alignment-based method. CAIM depends on two different containment techniques to identify species in metagenomic samples using their genome coverage information to filter out false positives rather than the traditional approach of relative abundance. In addition, we propose a nucleotide-count based abundance estimation, which yield lesser root mean square error than the traditional read-count approach. We evaluated the performance of CAIM on 28 metagenomic mock communities and 2 synthetic datasets by comparing it with other top-performing tools. CAIM maintained a consitently good performance across datasets in identifying microbial taxa and in estimating relative abundances than other tools. CAIM was then applied to a real dataset sequenced on both Nanopore (with and without amplification) and Illumina sequencing platforms and found high similality of taxonomic profiles between the sequencing platforms. Lastly, CAIM was applied to fecal shotgun metagenomic datasets of 232 colorectal cancer patients and 229 controls obtained from 4 different countries and primary 44 liver cancer patients and 76 controls. The predictive performance of models using the genome-coverage cutoff was better than those using the relative-abundance cutoffs in discriminating colorectal cancer and primary liver cancer patients from healthy controls with a highly confident species markers.

Indexed as

BioinformaticsGut microbiomeMetagenomeMetagenome coverageTaxonomic identification

Identifiers

PMID38746391
PMCPMC11091946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.