ArticleResearch square2024
Differences between human male and female neutrophils in mRNA, translation efficiency, protein, and phosphoprotein profiles.
Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Human males and females show differences in the incidence of neutrophil-associated diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, and reactive arthritis, and differences in neutrophil physiological responses such as a faster response to the chemorepellent SLIGKV. Little is known about the basis of sex-based differences in human neutrophils. Methods: Starting with human neutrophils from healthy donors, we used RNA-seq to examine total mRNA profiles, mRNAs not associated with ribosomes and thus not being translated, mRNAs in monosomes, and mRNAs in polysomes and thus heavily translated. We used mass spectrometry systems to identify proteins and phosphoproteins. Results: There were sex-based differences in the translation of 24 mRNAs. There were 132 proteins with higher levels in male neutrophils; these tended to be associated with RNA regulation, ribosome, and phosphoinositide signaling pathways, whereas 30 proteins with higher levels in female neutrophils were associated with metabolic processes, proteosomes, and phosphatase regulatory proteins. Male neutrophils had increased phosphorylation of 32 proteins. After exposure to SLIGKV, male neutrophils showed a faster response in terms of protein phosphorylation compared to female neutrophils. Conclusions: Male neutrophils have higher levels of proteins and higher phosphorylation of proteins associated with RNA processing and signaling pathways, while female neutrophils have higher levels of proteins associated with metabolism and proteolytic pathways. This suggests that male neutrophils might be more ready to adapt to a new environment, and female neutrophils might be more effective at responding to pathogens. This may contribute to the observed sex-based differences in neutrophil behavior and neutrophil-associated disease incidence and severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.