Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38746356›Full record

ArticleResearch square2024

A randomized phase III double-blind placebo-controlled trial of first line chemotherapy and trastuzumab with or without bevacizumab for patients with HER2/neu-positive metastatic breast cancer: a trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E1105).

Jessica Mezzanotte-Sharpe, Anne ONeill, Ingrid A Mayer, Carlos L Arteaga, Ximing J Yang, Lynne I Wagner, David Cella, Neal J Meropol, R Katherine Alpaugh, Thomas J Saphner and 12 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Jessica Mezzanotte-SharpeVanderbilt University Medical Center.
Anne ONeillDana-Farber Cancer Institute.
Ingrid A MayerVanderbilt University Medical Center.
Carlos L ArteagaThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
Ximing J YangNorthwestern University.
Lynne I WagnerWake Forest University.
David CellaNorthwestern University.
Neal J MeropolCase Western Reserve University.
R Katherine AlpaughFox Chase Cancer Center.
Thomas J SaphnerAurora Health Care.
Robert E SwaneyDenver Health Medical Center.
Karen L HoelzerMemorial Healthcare System.
William J GradisharNorthwestern University.
Vandana G AbramsonVanderbilt University Medical Center.
P Kothai SundaramColumbus NCI Community Clinical Oncology Research Program.
Shamim Z JilaniGood Samaritan Hospital.
Edith A PerezMayo Clinic.
Nancy U LinDana-Farber Cancer Institute.
Mohammad JahanzebUniversity of Miami.
Antonio C WolffJohns Hopkins University.
George W SledgeStanford Cancer Institute.
Sonya A ReidVanderbilt University Medical Center.

Funding

ECOG-ACRIN NCORP Research Base - TMISTUG1CA189828 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Peter J ODwyer, MITCHELL D. SCHNALL · 2014 to 2026
$199.7M
Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
Project-006U10CA180820 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Peter J ODwyer · 2014 to 2026
$167.6M
SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
Statistics CoreU10CA180794 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI PAUL J CATALANO, CONSTANTINE A. GATSONIS · 2014 to 2026
$111.2M
Heartland Cancer Research NCORPUG1CA189830 · NCI · DECATUR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL · PI Bryan A. Faller · 2014 to 2026
$40.9M
NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) - Community SitesUG1CA190140 · NCI · AURORA HEALTH CARE, INC. · PI Sigrun Hallmeyer, THOMAS J SAPHNER · 2014 to 2026
$20.0M
Western States Cancer Research NCORPUG1CA189805 · NCI · WESTERN STATES CANCER RESEARCH NCORP · PI Nicholas DiBella MD · 2014 to 2026
$12.0M
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center NCTN Lead Academic Participating SiteUG1CA233234 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Aaron Thomas Gerds, Daniel Eidelberg Spratt · 2019 to 2026
$11.1M
Dayton Clinical Oncology ProgramUG1CA189957 · NCI · DAYTON CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAM · PI Howard M Gross · 2014 to 2026
$10.7M
Columbus NCORP RFA-CA-18-016UG1CA189954 · NCI · COLUMBUS COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PRG · PI Aruna Gowda, Malolan S Rajagopalan · 2014 to 2026
$9.8M
NCTN Lead Academic Participating Site at Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer CareUG1CA233180 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Harold John Burstein · 2019 to 2026
$8.6M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180794NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180820NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189805NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189828NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189830NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189954NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189957NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA190140NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA232760NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233180NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233196NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233234NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233302NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In 2008, bevacizumab received accelerated Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for use in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Based on the preclinical and preliminary clinical activity of the trastuzumab and bevacizumab combination, ECOG-ACRIN E1105 trial was developed to determine if the addition of bevacizumab to a chemotherapy and trastuzumab combination for first-line therapy would improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with HER2-positive MBC. Findings: 96 patients were randomized to receive standard first-line chemotherapy and trastuzumab with or without bevacizumab between November 2007 and October 2009, and 93 began protocol therapy. Induction therapy was given for 24 weeks, followed by maintenance trastuzumab with or without bevacizumab. 60% (56/93) began carboplatin and 74% (69/93) completed 6 cycles of induction therapy. Primary endpoint was PFS. Median PFS was 11.1 and 13.8 months for placebo and bevacizumab arms, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 95%, Confidence Interval [Cl] for bevacizumab vs. placebo: 0.73 [0.43-1.23], p = 0.24), and at a median follow-up of 70.7 months, median survival was 49.1 and 63 months (HR [95% Cl] for OS: 1.09 [0.61-1.97], p = 0.75). The most common toxicities across both arms were neutropenia and hypertension, with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, fatigue, and sensory neuropathy reported more frequently with bevacizumab. Conclusions: In this trial, the addition of bevacizumab did not improve outcomes in patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Although the trial was underpowered due to smaller than anticipated sample size, these findings corroborated other clinical trials during this time.

Indexed as

bevacizumabbreast cancerchemotherapytrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID38746356
PMCPMC11092826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.