ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024
Providing HIV Treatment during community-wide flooding: experiences of clients and Health Care Workers in Malawi.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: In Malawi, community wide flooding, especially in high HIV burdened districts, continues to affect continuity of care and access to facilities. We explored the lived experiences of clients and healthcare workers (HCWs) to gain understanding of challenges and to propose interventions for improved ART care delivery. Methods: Participants came six health facilities and surrounding communities impacted by flooding between Dec 2021-Apr 2022 in Chikwawa, Nsanje and Mulanje districts in Malawi. Facilities are supported by Partners in Hope, a local NGO and PEPFAR/USAID partner.We conducted In-depth interviews with (IDIs) ART clients identified through medical chart reviews and focus group discussions (FGDs) with HCWs. IDIs and FGDs were coded using inductive and deductive methods in Atlas.ti. Results: We conducted IDIs with 23 respondents, of which, ten were women, ten experienced treatment interruption (>28 days without medication) and 17 relocated from their homes. The Six FGDs involved 37 HCWs. (21 ART providers; 16 lay cadre).In IDIs, most clients who relocated and lost livestock, possessions and ART medications. They travelling for income generation. Barriers to care included dangerous travel conditions, competing needs for time and fear of ill treatment at facilities. Some outreach clinics did not provide ART. Respondents were motivated to remain on care and motivators included fear of developing illnesses and HIV-status acceptance.All providers said that lack of standardized guidelines affected preparedness and response and they advocated for guidelines, stakeholder coordination and adequate resources. Most also reported personal physical exhaustion, damage to their own houses and property, and drug stock-outs. Documentation due to loss of registers was also mostly mentioned. Discussion: Clients motivated to remain in care but face barriers and challenges. National flooding protocols, adequate resource planning and seasonal 6-month ART dispensing may improve ART outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.