Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38746147›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024

The potential impact of removing a ban on electronic nicotine delivery systems using the Mexico smoking and vaping model (SAVM).

Luz María Sánchez-Romero, Yameng Li, Luis Zavala-Arciniega, Katia Gallegos-Carrillo, James F Thrasher, Rafael Meza, David T Levy

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luz María Sánchez-RomeroLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC. United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7951-3965
Yameng LiLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC. United States of America.
Luis Zavala-ArciniegaDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Katia Gallegos-CarrilloEpidemiology and Health Services Research Unit, Morelos, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Mexico.
James F ThrasherDepartment of Health Promotion, Education & Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6418-4863
Rafael MezaDepartment of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, British Columbia, Canada.
David T LevyLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC. United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5280-3612

Funding

Comparative Modeling of Lung Cancer Prevention, Early Detection and Treatment InterventionsU01CA253858 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DE KONING, HARRY J, HOLFORD, THEODORE R · 2020 to 2025
$8.4M
Electronic cigarettes in Latin America: Evaluation of impacts and policy optionsR01TW010652 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BARNOYA, JOAQUIN, THRASHER, JAMES · 2018 to 2021
$1.6M
Modeling the impact of tobacco regulations on US future trends of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.K01CA260378 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI SANCHEZ-ROMERO, LUZ MARIA · 2021 to 2025
$775k
FIC NIH HHS R01 TW010652NCI NIH HHS K01 CA260378NCI NIH HHS U01 CA253858
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To develop the Mexico Smoking and Vaping Model (Mexico SAVM) to estimate cigarette and electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) prevalence and the public health impact of legalizing ENDS use. Methods: SAVM, a cohort-based discrete-time simulation model, compares two scenarios. The Results: Compared to a national ENDS ban, The Mexico SAVM projects that legalizing ENDS use could decrease smoking prevalence by 40.1% in males and 30.9% in females by 2049 compared to continuing the national ENDS ban. This reduction in prevalence would save 2.9 (2.5 males and 0.4 females) million life-years and avert almost 106 (91.0 males and 15.5 females) thousand deaths between 2025 and 2049. Public health gains decline by 43% to 59,748 SVADs averted when the switching rate is reduced by half and by 24.3% (92,806 SVADs averted) with a 25% ENDS risk level from that of cigarettes but increased by 24.3% (121,375 SVADs averted) with the 5% ENDS risk. Conclusions: Mexico SAVM suggests that greater access to ENDS and a more permissive ENDS regulation, simultaneous with strong cigarette policies, would reduce smoking prevalence and decrease smoking-related mortality. The unanticipated effects of an ENDS ban merit closer scrutiny, with further consideration of how specific ENDS restrictions may maximize public health benefits.

Identifiers

PMID38746147
PMCPMC11092684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.