Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38746092›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

A metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist enhances visual signal fidelity in a mouse model of retinitis pigmentosa.

Xiaoyi Li, Miloslav Sedlacek, Amurta Nath, Klaudia P Szatko, William N Grimes, Jeffrey S Diamond

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaoyi LiSynaptic Physiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA 20892.
Miloslav SedlacekSynaptic Physiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA 20892.
Amurta NathSynaptic Physiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA 20892.
Klaudia P SzatkoSynaptic Physiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA 20892.
William N GrimesSynaptic Physiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA 20892.
Jeffrey S DiamondSynaptic Physiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA 20892.ORCID 0000-0002-1770-2629

Funding

Synaptic Mechanisms in the Mammalian RetinaZIANS003039 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI DIAMOND, JEFFREY S · 2009 to 2025
$24.5M
Synaptic Mechanisms in the Mammalian RetinaZ01NS003039 · NINDS · NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI DIAMOND, JEFFREY S · 2007 to 2008
$2.8M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 NS003039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many inherited retinal diseases target photoreceptors, which transduce light into a neural signal that is processed by the downstream visual system. As photoreceptors degenerate, physiological and morphological changes to retinal synapses and circuitry reduce sensitivity and increase noise, degrading visual signal fidelity. Here, we pharmacologically targeted the first synapse in the retina in an effort to reduce circuit noise without sacrificing visual sensitivity. We tested a strategy to partially replace the neurotransmitter lost when photoreceptors die with an agonist of receptors that ON bipolars cells use to detect glutamate released from photoreceptors. In

Identifiers

PMID38746092
PMCPMC11092665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.