Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38746080›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2024

Subthalamic nucleus but not entopeduncular nucleus deep brain stimulation enhances neurogenesis in the SVZ-olfactory bulb system of Parkinsonian rats.

Mareike Fauser, Jan Philipp Payonk, Hanna Weber, Meike Statz, Christine Winter, Ravit Hadar, Revathi Appali, Ursula van Rienen, Moritz D Brandt, Alexander Storch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mareike FauserDepartment of Neurology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Jan Philipp PayonkInstitute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Hanna WeberDepartment of Neurology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Meike StatzDepartment of Neurology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Christine WinterDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ravit HadarDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Revathi AppaliInstitute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Ursula van RienenInstitute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Moritz D BrandtDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Alexander StorchDepartment of Neurology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a highly effective treatment option in Parkinson's disease. However, the underlying mechanisms of action, particularly effects on neuronal plasticity, remain enigmatic. Adult neurogenesis in the subventricular zone-olfactory bulb (SVZ-OB) axis and in the dentate gyrus (DG) has been linked to various non-motor symptoms in PD, e.g., memory deficits and olfactory dysfunction. Since DBS affects several of these non-motor symptoms, we analyzed the effects of DBS in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and the entopeduncular nucleus (EPN) on neurogenesis in 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-lesioned hemiparkinsonian rats. Methods: In our study, we applied five weeks of continuous bilateral STN-DBS or EPN-DBS in 6-OHDA-lesioned rats with stable dopaminergic deficits compared to 6-OHDA-lesioned rats with corresponding sham stimulation. We injected two thymidine analogs to quantify newborn neurons early after DBS onset and three weeks later. Immunohistochemistry identified newborn cells co-labeled with NeuN, TH and GABA within the OB and DG. As a putative mechanism, we simulated the electric field distribution depending on the stimulation site to analyze direct electric effects on neural stem cell proliferation. Results: STN-DBS persistently increased the number of newborn dopaminergic and GABAergic neurons in the OB but not in the DG, while EPN-DBS does not impact neurogenesis. These effects do not seem to be mediated via direct electric stimulation of neural stem/progenitor cells within the neurogenic niches. Discussion: Our data support target-specific effects of STN-DBS on adult neurogenesis, a putative modulator of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease.

Indexed as

6-hydroxydopamineadult neurogenesisdeep brain stimulationelectric field distributionentopeduncular nucleusParkinson’s diseasesubthalamic nucleus

Identifiers

PMID38746080
PMCPMC11091264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.