ArticleIn silico pharmacology2024
An immunoinformatic approach for developing a multi-epitope subunit vaccine against Monkeypox virus.
Article in In silico pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The hydatid cyst fluid protein EgAgB8/1 demonstrates potent immunogenicity by eliciting robust humoral and cellular immune responses in mice.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Computational design of a multiepitope vaccine targeting VP1 and VP2 capsid proteins of simian virus 40 (SV40) for enhanced immune activation.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2026Article
- Identification of potential antigenic proteins and epitopes for the development of a monkeypox virus vaccine: an in silico approach.Molecular diversity · 2025Article
- Enhanced multistress tolerance ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing Nipah virus vaccinology: insights into subunit vaccine development strategies and immunological advances.In silico pharmacology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An in-silico approach was implemented to develop a multi-epitope subunit vaccine construct against the recent outbreak of the Monkeypox virus. The contribution of 10 different antigenic proteins based on their antigenicity led to the selection of 10 HTL, 9 CTL, and 6 BCL epitopes. The construct was further investigated for its allergenicity, antigenicity, and physio-chemical properties using servers such as AllerTOP and Allergen FP, VaxiJen and ANTIGENPro, and ProtParam respectively. The secondary structure of the vaccine was predicted using the SOPMA server followed by I-TASSER for the 3D structure. After refinement and validation of structural stability of the modelled vaccine, a molecular docking assay was implemented to study the interaction of the known TLR4 receptor with that of the constructed vaccine using the ClusPro server. The docked vaccine and TLR4 receptor were studied using the molecular dynamics (MD) simulation to validate the stability of the complex. After codon optimization the cDNA was constructed and in-silico cloning of the vaccine construct was carried out. The vaccine was also subjected to computational immune assay which predicted a powerful immune response against the Monkeypox virus validating that the developed multi-epitope vaccine construct can be a potent vaccine candidate. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40203-024-00220-5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.