ArticleJPRAS open2024
The Goettingen minipig as an experimental model in wound-healing studies.
Article in JPRAS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Deep dermal wounds in extensive burns and chronic wound-healing disorders represent a significant medical problem and require a high level of therapy to reduce the risk of infection and other long-term consequences, such as amputation. A better understanding of the wound-healing processes is essential, and animal models are indispensable to fundamental research. Objective: This study aimed to provide a transparent protocol and prove the effectiveness of an Material and methods: Thirteen female Goettingen minipigs were kept in species-appropriate housing and were treated according to the German law for the protection of animals. The study was performed with permission from the local ethical review committee of animal welfare. The experimental procedure for studying dermal regeneration in 102 full-thickness wounds through clinical observation and histological analysis, focusing on neodermal formation, is described in detail. Results: The Goettingen minipig model proved to be suitable in wound-healing studies. The dermal regeneration was evident and viewable without wound contamination or any rejection reaction. The histological evaluations were also reliable and clearly presented the optimized wound healing of deep dermal wounds using the different therapeutic approaches. Conclusion: Given the great clinical need for alternative or complementary therapies, we considered the Goettingen minipig trial a reliable, ethically justifiable, effective, and reproducible in vivo model for wound-healing studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.