Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38746036›Full record

ArticleMedicine and pharmacy reports2024

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, platelet to lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte to monocyte ratio and Systemic Inflammatory Index in sexually transmitted diseases.

Martina-Luciana Pintea-Trifu, Silvia-Ştefana Balici, Mihaela Laura Vică, Daniel-Corneliu Leucuţa, Horia George Coman, Bogdan Nemeş, Horea-Vladi Matei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine and pharmacy reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hematological Ratios inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Martina-Luciana Pintea-TrifuDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Silvia-Ştefana BaliciDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Mihaela Laura VicăDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Daniel-Corneliu LeucuţaDepartment of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Horia George ComanDepartment of Medical Psychology and Psychiatry, Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Bogdan NemeşDepartment of Medical Psychology and Psychiatry, Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Horea-Vladi MateiDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Hematologic biomarkers of inflammation may serve as valuable adjuncts in clinical practice, aiding in several aspects such as differential diagnosis, prognostic assessment for patient stratification and monitoring the efficacy of antimicrobial therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR), Lymphocyte to Monocyte Ratio (LMR), and Systemic Inflammatory Index (SII) in predicting bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STI). Methods: This prospective study was conducted in the north-west region of Romania and included patients from several medical special units such as dermatology, obstetrics-gynecology, urology, and general practice. The study group comprised patients with a high suspicion of STI, while the control group consisted of healthy subjects. Quantitative data are presented as medians (interquartile ranges). Results: The median values of SII, NLR, and SIRI were higher in the group of subjects with sexually transmitted diseases compared to the control group [604.06 (432.36 - 880.02) vs. 556.89 (388.63 - 874.19); 2.61 (1.57 - 3.3) vs. 2.29 (1.66 - 3.26); and 0.95 (0.53 - 1.52) vs. 0.89 (0.67 - 1.34)]. Regarding PLR, the median values were lower in the group of subjects with sexually transmitted diseases compared to the control group [138.1 (99.19 - 169.6) vs. 140.65 (117 - 190.32)]. As for LMR, the median values were equal between the two groups [4.64 (3.74 - 6.11) vs. 4.64 (3.75 - 5.45)]. Nevertheless, the differences did not reach the significance level. Conclusion: Our study suggests that inflammatory biomarkers might aid in detecting bacterial STIs, but their significance was not statistically confirmed. Further research on alternative laboratory tests is needed for improved STI diagnosis and management.

Indexed as

inflammatory biomarkersLMRNLRPLRsexually transmitted diseasesSIISIRIvenereology

Identifiers

PMID38746036
PMCPMC11090274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.