ArticleMedicine and pharmacy reports2024
The carcinogenic capacity of arsenic in normal epithelial breast cells and double-positive breast cancer cells.
Article in Medicine and pharmacy reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Water arsenic levels and breast cancer risk in a United States-wide prospective cohort.Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) · 2026Article
- In Vitro Effects of Anaesthetic Compounds on a Panel of Solid Tumour Cell Lines-An Exploratory Study.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: The carcinogenic effect of arsenic is a subject of controversy in relation to breast cancer. In our current research, we aimed to simulate the effects of chronic low-level arsenic exposure on breast cells by intoxicating MCF-10A and MCF-7 cells with 1 μM Arsenic trioxide (As2O3) for 3 weeks (3w) and 6 weeks (6w), respectively. Methods: We assessed the cellular responses to As2O3 through various assays, including confocal fluorescence microscopy, flow cytometry for cell cycle analysis, Transwell invasion assay, scratch assay, and colony assay. Additionally, we analyzed the mutation burden in all the exposed cells by using the next generation sequencing technology. Results: Our findings indicate that As2O3 has a minor carcinogenic effect in normal cells, with no definitive evidence of malignant transformation observed after 6 weeks of exposure. In the case of breast cancer cells, As2O3 exhibits a dual effect, both inhibitory and stimulatory. It leads to reduced colony formation ability at 6 weeks, while enhancing the cells' ability for invasion. The mutations triggered by As2O3 exposure are distributed across genes with both tumor-suppressive and oncogenic functions. Five mutations are common to both cell lines, involving the following genes: Conclusion: In summary, our study reveals that a 6-weeks exposure to arsenic has a limited carcinogenic effect in normal breast cells and a dual role in breast cancer cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.