ArticlePrecision clinical medicine2024
Article in Precision clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Clinical outcomes and genomic landscape of anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates in HER2-positive and HER2-low metastatic breast cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Article
- Allelic Imbalance and Chromothripsis Lead to Diversity in Japanese Tumor Genomes With Whole-Genome Duplication.Cancer science · 2025Article
- Uterine fibroids show evidence of shared genetic architecture with blood pressure traits.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: Clinical next-generation sequencing (NGS) of both tumor and paired blood DNA from 119 breast cancer patients (BRCA-119 cohort) was performed with a 520-gene panel. Mutations, tumor mutation burden (TMB), and genomic HRD scores were assessed from NGS data. NGS data from 47 breast cancer patients in the HRD test cohort were analyzed for further verification. Results: All Conclusions:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.