Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38745905›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nursing studies advances2020

The evolution of professional obstetric nursing in the United States (1880's-present): Qualitative content analysis of specialty nursing textbooks.

Antonia M Nelson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Antonia M NelsonSaint Anselm College Department of Nursing, 100 saint Anselm Drive #1745, Manchester, NH 03102-1310, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Professional maternal-newborn/obstetric nursing in the United States emerged in the mid- 19th century coinciding with the increased medical management of childbirth. Before this mothers were attended by female family members, friends, neighbors and lay nurses or midwives. Objective: To trace the evolution of professional maternal-newborn/obstetric nursing since its inception, identify factors which may have influenced this evolution, and consider how this knowledge can inform current issues and challenges in caring for childbearing families. Methods: Qualitative content analysis, informed by historical research methods, was used to analyze selected content from a sample of maternal-newborn/obstetric nursing textbooks published from the 1880's to the present. Findings: The last 150 years have been characterized by vast changes in medicine, technology and the healthcare system which have all influenced the evolution of professional maternal-newborn/obstetric nursing. Over the decades there has also been a significant change in the conceptualization of pregnancy/childbearing and our relative understanding of maternal and infant vulnerability. Findings revealed, however, that over time the primary focus of professional maternal-newborn/obstetric nursing care has consistently been: Conclusions: Since its origins the nursing profession has matured and nursing's allegience is now clearly to patients and society Today's nurses have the opportunity to play a key role in advocating for healthcare reform which would allow for less interference in the natural birth process, maximize patient outcomes, decrease inequities, and make comprehensive care for all mothers and infants a national priority.

Indexed as

HistoryInfantNewbornNursingObstetricsPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID38745905
PMCPMC11080463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.