ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2024
Fractional exhaled nitric oxide distribution and its relevant factors in the general adult population and its healthy subpopulation.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Refining mild asthma phenotyping with FeNO: a population-based evaluation.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2025Article
- Serum and nasal lavage fluid eosinophil-derived neurotoxin levels and their determinants in adults.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Measurement of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (Feno) has been used in the diagnosis and management of asthma. Understanding the distribution of Feno in a larger resident population and its "healthy" subpopulation would contribute to the interpretation of Feno in clinical practice. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the distribution and its associated factors in the adult population and its healthy subpopulations. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 8,638 men and 17,288 women aged 20 years or older living in Miyagi prefecture, Japan. We investigated the distribution of Feno and its associated factors in all subjects, a subpopulation with no history of upper and lower airway diseases (healthy subpopulation 1), and a subpopulation with no history of upper and lower airway diseases, normal lung function, and no positivity for other biomarkers of type 2 inflammation (healthy subpopulation 2). Results: The distribution of Feno in healthy subpopulations, especially in healthy subpopulation 2 (median [interquartile range], 17 [12-23] with 95th percentile of 36 ppb) was lower than in all subjects (19 [13-26] ppb with 95th percentile of 47 ppb). In healthy subpopulation 1, 10.3% had elevated Feno (≥35 ppb), and elevated Feno was positively associated with factors including obstructive ventilatory defect, blood eosinophilia, house dust mite-specific IgE positivity, and history of hypertension. Male sex was associated with elevated Feno in all subjects and healthy subpopulations. Conclusion: The distribution of Feno in the healthy subpopulation supports the validity of the criteria (≥35 ppb) currently used in Japan for the diagnosis of asthma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.