ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2024
Prediction of pediatric peanut oral food challenge outcomes using machine learning.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Food Allergy in Children Aged <2 Years with Atopic Dermatitis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Paediatric Allergy: From Diagnostic Support to Precision Medicine.Cureus · 2026Review
- Innovative diagnostic techniques and their clinical implications in food allergy: current clinical practice and future perspectives.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
- Emerging molecular and environmental biomarkers of shrimp allergy in African Americans in the US.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
- Digital health in allergy care: current practices, evidence, and future prospects.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
- The Neuroimmune Axis in Atopic Dermatitis: From Pathogenic Mechanisms to Targeted Neuroimmunotherapy.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Review
- Ethical aspects of the application of artificial intelligence in allergology.Allergologie select · 2025Review
- Predicting first-time anaphylaxis in the elderly using stacked machine learning and population registers.Frontiers in allergy · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in pediatric allergy research.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Review
- Rise of the machines: The future may be here for food allergy diagnostics.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2024Article
- The future of food allergy diagnosis.Frontiers in allergy · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Clinical testing, including food-specific skin and serum IgE level tests, provides limited accuracy to predict food allergy. Confirmatory oral food challenges (OFCs) are often required, but the associated risks, cost, and logistic difficulties comprise a barrier to proper diagnosis. Objective: We sought to utilize advanced machine learning methodologies to integrate clinical variables associated with peanut allergy to create a predictive model for OFCs to improve predictive performance over that of purely statistical methods. Methods: Machine learning was applied to the Learning Early about Peanut Allergy (LEAP) study of 463 peanut OFCs and associated clinical variables. Patient-wise cross-validation was used to create ensemble models that were evaluated on holdout test sets. These models were further evaluated by using 2 additional peanut allergy OFC cohorts: the IMPACT study cohort and a local University of Michigan cohort. Results: In the LEAP data set, the ensemble models achieved a maximum mean area under the curve of 0.997, with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.994 and 1.00, respectively. In the combined validation data sets, the top ensemble model achieved a maximum area under the curve of 0.871, with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.763 and 0.980, respectively. Conclusions: Machine learning models for predicting peanut OFC results have the potential to accurately predict OFC outcomes, potentially minimizing the need for OFCs while increasing confidence in food allergy diagnoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.