Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38745865›Full record

ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2024

Prediction of pediatric peanut oral food challenge outcomes using machine learning.

Jonathan Gryak, Aleksandra Georgievska, Justin Zhang, Kayvan Najarian, Rajan Ravikumar, Georgiana Sanders, Charles F Schuler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Artificial intelligence in pediatric allergy research.European journal of pediatrics · 2024
    Review
  10. Rise of the machines: The future may be here for food allergy diagnostics.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2024
    Article
  11. The future of food allergy diagnosis.Frontiers in allergy · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jonathan GryakDepartment of Computer Science, Queens College, City University of New York, New York, NY.
Aleksandra GeorgievskaDepartment of Computer Science, Queens College, City University of New York, New York, NY.
Justin ZhangDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Kayvan NajarianDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Rajan RavikumarDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Georgiana SandersDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Charles F SchulerDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.

Funding

The role of epithelial barrier dysfunction in food anaphylaxisK23AI162661 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Charles F Schuler · 2022 to 2026
$972k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI162661NIAID NIH HHS L30 AI171988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Clinical testing, including food-specific skin and serum IgE level tests, provides limited accuracy to predict food allergy. Confirmatory oral food challenges (OFCs) are often required, but the associated risks, cost, and logistic difficulties comprise a barrier to proper diagnosis. Objective: We sought to utilize advanced machine learning methodologies to integrate clinical variables associated with peanut allergy to create a predictive model for OFCs to improve predictive performance over that of purely statistical methods. Methods: Machine learning was applied to the Learning Early about Peanut Allergy (LEAP) study of 463 peanut OFCs and associated clinical variables. Patient-wise cross-validation was used to create ensemble models that were evaluated on holdout test sets. These models were further evaluated by using 2 additional peanut allergy OFC cohorts: the IMPACT study cohort and a local University of Michigan cohort. Results: In the LEAP data set, the ensemble models achieved a maximum mean area under the curve of 0.997, with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.994 and 1.00, respectively. In the combined validation data sets, the top ensemble model achieved a maximum area under the curve of 0.871, with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.763 and 0.980, respectively. Conclusions: Machine learning models for predicting peanut OFC results have the potential to accurately predict OFC outcomes, potentially minimizing the need for OFCs while increasing confidence in food allergy diagnoses.

Indexed as

anaphylaxisfood allergymachine learningoral food challengesPeanut allergy

Identifiers

PMID38745865
PMCPMC11090861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.