ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024
Reproductive factors and cardiometabolic disease among middle-aged and older women: a nationwide study from CHARLS.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of cholesterol-HDL-glucose index in anticipating risk of cardiometabolic diseases: a comparative study with triglyceride-glucose index.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Associations between reproductive factors and frailty in middle-aged and older women: evidence from the China health and retirement longitudinal study.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Article
- Link between fertility behavior and edentulous jaw in middle-aged Chinese women: a cross-sectional study from the CHARLS.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Association of Female Reproductive Factors with Incident Cardiometabolic Disease: Finding from a European Population-Based Study.Global heart · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiometabolic disease is skyrocketing to epidemic proportions due to the high prevalence of its components and the aging of the worldwide population. More efforts are needed to improve cardiometabolic health. The aim of this nationally representative study based on the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS, 2014-2018) was to examine the association between reproductive factors and cardiometabolic disease among Chinese women aged ≥45 years. Methods: The CHARLS is an ongoing longitudinal study initiated in 2011, and the latest follow-up was completed in 2018. In total, 6,407 participants were analyzed. Effect-sizes are expressed as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Confounding was considered from statistical adjustment, subsidiary exploration, and unmeasured confounding assessment aspects. Results: Of 6,407 accessible participants, 60.9% were recorded as having one or more of five predefined cardiovascular or metabolic disorders. Compared to those with two children, participants who had 0-1 child were found to have a lower risk of cardiometabolic disease (OR = 0.844, 95% CI: 0.714-0.998), and those who had ≥3 children had a greater risk (OR = 1.181, 95% CI: 1.027-1.357). Age at menarche of 16-18 years was a protective factor compared with ≤16 years of age (OR = 0.858, 95% CI: 0.749-0.982). In contrast, participants with a history of abortion were 1.212 times more likely to have cardiometabolic disorders (OR = 1.212, 95% CI: 1.006-1.465). The likelihood for the presence of unmeasured confounding was low, as reflected by E-values. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that number of children, age at menarche, and history of abortion were associated with a significant risk of cardiometabolic disease among Chinese women aged ≥45 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.