Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38745738›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2024

Effects of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on early postoperative pain and recovery: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Shi-Yan Tan, Hua Jiang, Qiong Ma, Xin Ye, Xi Fu, Yi-Feng Ren, Feng-Ming You

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07714980 (Effect of Perioperative vs Postoperative-Only Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation on Gastrointestinal Recovery and Pain Control After Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07714980 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Perioperative vs Postoperative-Only Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation on Gastrointestinal Recovery and Pain Control After Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy: A Multicenter, Three-Arm, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityRan2026 to 2028Enrolled300ConditionsGastric Cancer (GC), Stomach NeoplasmsArmsTranscutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation, Sham Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shi-Yan Tan *Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Hua Jiang *Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Qiong Ma *Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Xin YeHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Xi FuHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Yi-Feng RenHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Feng-Ming YouHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have indicated beneficial outcomes of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS), but high-quality and comprehensive meta-analyses are lacking. The aim was to quantitatively analyze the efficacy and safety of perioperative TEAS on postoperative pain and recovery. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched through July 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the perioperative application of TEAS in adults compared with sham-TEAS and/or non-TEAS were eligible. Cumulative analgesic consumption within 24 h and rest pain scores at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively were the two co-primary outcomes. Results: Seventy-six RCTs ( Conclusion: This article describes current evidence about TEAS intervention on early postoperative pain and recovery. The results support the effectiveness of TEAS, but more high-quality evidence of clinical applicability is also needed. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO (CRD42021249814).

Indexed as

meta-analysispainrecoverysurgerytranscutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation

Identifiers

PMID38745738
PMCPMC11092893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.