Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38745635›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2022

Doctoral education, advanced practice and research: An analysis by nurse leaders from countries within the six WHO regions.

Mi Ja Kim, Hugh McKenna, Patricia Davidson, Helena Leino-Kilpi, Andrea Baumann, Hester Klopper, Naeema Al-Gasseer, Wipada Kunaviktikul, Suresh K Sharma, Carla Ventura and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mi Ja KimCollege of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, United States of America.
Hugh McKennaSchool of Nursing, Ulster University, UK.
Patricia DavidsonWollongong University, Australia.
Helena Leino-KilpiDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Finland.
Andrea BaumannGlobal Health, WHO Collaborating Centre in Primary Care Nursing & Health Human Resources, McMaster University, Canada.
Hester KlopperStellenboscch University, South Africa.
Naeema Al-GasseerWHO Representative in Egypt, Egypt.
Wipada KunaviktikulHealth Science Affairs and School of Nursing, Panyapiwat Institute of Management, Thailand.
Suresh K SharmaCollege of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India.
Carla VenturaWHO Collaborating Center, College of Nursing, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Taewha LeeCollege of Nursing, Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei University, Republic of Korea.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Doctoral education, advanced practice and research are key elements that have shaped the advancement of nursing. Their impact is augmented when they are integrated and synergistic. To date, no publications have examined these elements holistically or through an international lens. Like a three-legged stool they are inter-reliant and interdependent. Research is integral to doctoral education and influential in informing best practice. This significance and originality of this discussion paper stem from an analysis of these three topics, their history, current status and associated challenges. It is undertaken by renowned leaders in 11 countries within the six World Health Organisation (WHO) regions: South Africa, Egypt, Finland, United Kingdom, Brazil, Canada, United States, India, Thailand, Australia, and the Republic of Korea. The first two authors used a purposive approach to identify nine recognized nurse leaders in each of the six WHO regions. These individuals have presented and published papers on one or more of the three topics. They have led, or currently lead, large strategic organisations in their countries or elsewhere. All these accomplished scholars agreed to collect relevant data and contribute to the analysis as co-authors. Doctoral education has played a pivotal role in advancing nurse scholarship. Many Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) prepared nurses become faculty who go on to educate and guide future nurse researchers. They generate the evidence base for nursing practice, which contributes to improved health outcomes. In this paper, the development of nursing doctoral programmes is examined. Furthermore, PhDs and professional doctorates, including the Doctor of Nursing Practice, are discussed, and trends, challenges and recommendations are presented. The increasing number of advanced practice nurses worldwide contributes to better health outcomes. Nonetheless, this paper shows that the role remains absent or underdeveloped in many countries. Moreover, role ambiguity and role confusion are commonplace and heterogeneity in definitions and titles, and regulatory and legislatorial inconsistencies limit the role's acceptance and adoption. Globally, nursing research studies continue to increase in number and quality, and nurse researchers are becoming partners and leaders in interdisciplinary investigations. Nonetheless, this paper highlights poor investment in nursing research and a lack of reliable data on the number and amount of funding obtained by nurse researchers. The recommendations offered in this paper aim to address the challenges identified. They have significant implications for policy makers, government legislators and nurse leaders.

Indexed as

Advanced nursing practiceDoctor of nursing practiceNursing researchPhDProfessional doctorateWHO regions

Identifiers

PMID38745635
PMCPMC11080457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.