ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2022
End of life decisions and preference of place of death among geriatric and chronic disease patients: A scoping review.
Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Approaches to screening and enrollment in clinical trials for seriously ill older adults in rural Appalachia.Contemporary clinical trials · 2026Article
- Homecare workers needs and experiences in end of life care: rapid review.BMJ supportive & palliative care · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Geriatric and chronic disease patients and families consider the nature, time, and place of death because issues related to the end of life are rarely discussed. This study assessed the end of life decisions and preferences among geriatric and chronic disease patients. Methods: There was an in-depth search in five electronic databases (PubMed Central, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus) using the population, concept, and context, framework. A matrix was developed, discussed, accepted, and used for data extraction. Convergent synthesis and thematic data analysis technique were adopted for the analysis. The reporting of findings was done in accordance with the JBI and PRISMA guidelines for reviews. Results: From the data analysis, home-based end of life care was intuitive and included home visits, telephone follow-up, and patient-initiated services. The key themes that emerged from our analysis that sought to influence end end of life decisions were 1) approach to home-based end of life care, 2) patient and family characteristics, 3) clinical characteristics of the patient, 4) health care provider factors, 5) satisfaction and care rendered to the patient and family, 6) family preference of the place of death, 7) collaboration between multidisciplinary teams of care, and 8) challenges associated with the home-based end of life care. The personal characteristics of the nurse (age, personal and work experience, nursing perspective, and competence) and conducting a home visit influenced patient and family end of life decision. Multidisciplinary care teams (nurses and palliative care specialists) were important in delivering effective end-of-life services. Conclusion: To support patients in making informed decisions, they must be educated on expected outcomes and implications, adverse impacts of decisions, and the emotional influence on the bereaved family. It is important that divergent technological methods are leveraged to provide essential care to patients nearing the end of life at home. Advancing the quality of end of life care techniques through home visiting will improve the feeling of patients and families about the dying process. Tweetable abstracts: End-of-life preferences warrants that, divergent technological methods are leveraged to provide care to patients nearing the end of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.