ArticleThe Permanente journal2024
Exploring Sociodemographic Factors in Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis in a Northern California Patient Population.
Article in The Permanente journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAllergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a subtype of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) that has previously been associated with younger age and Black patients. However, the role of demographic and socioeconomic factors in AFRS severity remains to be fully elucidated.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to determine whether demographic and socioeconomic factors are associated with incidence of AFRS, as well as with disease severity in Northern California.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted of adult patients with AFRS and CRS from 2010 to 2019. AFRS was determined by the Bent and Kuhn criteria, and severity was assessed by radiographic evidence of cranioorbital invasion and other clinical parameters. Chi-square and t-test were used to assess demographic and socioeconomic differences between AFRS and CRS cohorts, and multivariable logistic regression was used to assess risk factors for severe AFRS.
resultsBlack patients represented 26.2% (55/210 patients) of the AFRS group and 4.9% (842/17,300 patients) of the CRS group, with pairwise comparison of race/ethnicity categories showing that the AFRS group had significantly higher proportions of Black race/ethnicity compared with other race/ethnicities (p < 0.01). AFRS and CRS groups differed significantly by age, with mean ages of 48.7 and 51.0 years, respectively (p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in gender, Medicaid status, comorbidities, and socioeconomic status measures. Multivariate logistic regression showed that Black patients had higher odds of having severe AFRS (adjusted odds ratio = 2.29; 95% confidence interval: 1.18-4.45).
conclusionAFRS has a unique predilection for Black patients, and severe disease is also more likely in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.