Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38745322›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2024

Video mirror feedback induces more extensive brain activation compared to the mirror box: an fNIRS study in healthy adults.

Julien Bonnal, Canan Ozsancak, Fabrice Prieur, Pascal Auzou

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04738851 (ARTHEMIRS), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04738851 nacompletednot on this map

ARTHEMIRS: Assessment of Brain Activation During Different Mirror Therapy Tasks Using fNIRS Technology

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Régional d'OrléansRan2021 to 2021Enrolled35ConditionsHealthyArmsTherapy Mirror task
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julien BonnalService de Neurologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Orléans, 14 Avenue de l'Hôpital, Orleans, 45100, France. julien.bonnal@chu-orleans.fr.
Canan OzsancakService de Neurologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Orléans, 14 Avenue de l'Hôpital, Orleans, 45100, France.
Fabrice PrieurCIAMS, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay Cedex, 91405, France.
Pascal AuzouService de Neurologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Orléans, 14 Avenue de l'Hôpital, Orleans, 45100, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMirror therapy (MT) has been shown to be effective for motor recovery of the upper limb after a stroke. The cerebral mechanisms of mirror therapy involve the precuneus, premotor cortex and primary motor cortex. Activation of the precuneus could be a marker of this effectiveness. MT has some limitations and video therapy (VT) tools are being developed to optimise MT. While the clinical superiority of these new tools remains to be demonstrated, comparing the cerebral mechanisms of these different modalities will provide a better understanding of the related neuroplasticity mechanisms.

methodsThirty-three right-handed healthy individuals were included in this study. Participants were equipped with a near-infrared spectroscopy headset covering the precuneus, the premotor cortex and the primary motor cortex of each hemisphere. Each participant performed 3 tasks: a MT task (right hand movement and left visual feedback), a VT task (left visual feedback only) and a control task (right hand movement only). Perception of illusion was rated for MT and VT by asking participants to rate the intensity using a visual analogue scale. The aim of this study was to compare brain activation during MT and VT. We also evaluated the correlation between the precuneus activation and the illusion quality of the visual mirrored feedback.

resultsWe found a greater activation of the precuneus contralateral to the visual feedback during VT than during MT. We also showed that activation of primary motor cortex and premotor cortex contralateral to visual feedback was more extensive in VT than in MT. Illusion perception was not correlated with precuneus activation.

conclusionVT led to greater activation of a parieto-frontal network than MT. This could result from a greater focus on visual feedback and a reduction in interhemispheric inhibition in VT because of the absence of an associated motor task. These results suggest that VT could promote neuroplasticity mechanisms in people with brain lesions more efficiently than MT. CLINICAL

trial registrationNCT04738851.

Indexed as

Feedback, SensoryMotor CortexSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredAdultBrainFemaleHumansMaleParietal LobePsychomotor PerformanceYoung AdultCerebral activationfNIRSMirror therapyMotor cortexPrecuneusVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID38745322
PMCPMC11092069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.