Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38745162›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2024

Long-term prognosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal cancer in older adult patients.

Hirona Konishi, Yuji Urabe, Takeo Nakamura, Kazuki Ishibashi, Junichi Mizuno, Motomitsu Fukuhara, Takeshi Takasago, Hidenori Tanaka, Akiyoshi Tsuboi, Ken Yamashita and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Hirona KonishiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yuji UrabeDepartment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Medicine, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minamiku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan. beyan13@hiroshima-u.ac.jp.
Takeo NakamuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Kazuki IshibashiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Junichi MizunoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Motomitsu FukuharaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Takeshi TakasagoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hidenori TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Akiyoshi TsuboiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Ken YamashitaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yuichi HiyamaDepartment of Clinical Research Center, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hidehiko TakigawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Takahiro KotachiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Ryo YugeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Akira IshikawaDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Shiro OkaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe validity of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in older individuals with comorbidities remains unclear. Therefore, this study evaluated the safety and efficacy of ESD and additional treatment for ESCC in older adult patients.

methodsThe clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes of 398 consecutive older adult patients (≥ 65 years) with 505 lesions who underwent ESD for ESCC at the Hiroshima University Hospital between September 2007 and December 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Additionally, the prognoses of 381 patients who were followed up for > 3 years were assessed.

resultsThe mean patient age and procedure time were 73.1 ± 5.8 years and 77.1 ± 43.5 min, respectively. The histological en bloc resection rate was 98% (496/505). Postoperative stenosis, perforation, pneumonia, and delayed bleeding were conservatively treated in 82 (16%), 19 (4%), 15 (3%), and 5 (1%) patients, respectively. The 5-year overall and disease-specific survival rates were 78.9% and 98.0%, respectively (mean follow-up time: 71.1 ± 37.3 months). Multivariate analysis showed that age and the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of physical status class ≥III (hazard ratio: 1.27; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.59, p = 0.0392) were independently associated with overall survival. A significantly lower overall survival rate was observed in the high-risk follow-up group than in the low-risk follow-up and high-risk additional treatment groups (p < 0.01). However, no significant difference in disease-specific survival was observed among the three groups.

conclusionsESD is safe for ESCC treatment in patients aged ≥ 65 years. However, additional treatments should be considered based on the patient's general condition.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaPostoperative ComplicationsAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHumansMalePrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeAmerican Society of anesthesiologists classification of physical status classEndoscopic submucosal dissectionEsophageal cancerLong-term prognosisOlder individual

Identifiers

PMID38745162
PMCPMC11091999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.