ArticlePediatric research2024
Milrinone in persistent pulmonary hypertension of newborn: a scoping review.
Article in Pediatric research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn: A Practical Review for UK Level 2 Local Neonatal Units.Cureus · 2026Review
- Can Milrinone Be a Therapeutic Alternative in Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn? A Case Series and Narrative Review.Pediatric reports · 2025Article
- Tachycardia and persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) is a common neonatal condition in newborns admitted to the neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). PPHN has still a high mortality and morbidity. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is the first line vasodilator therapy for PPHN in high income countries. In low-to-middle income countries (LMICs), availability of iNO remains scarce and expensive. The purpose of this scoping review was to evaluate the current existing literature for milrinone therapy in PPHN and to identify the knowledge gaps in milrinone use in infants with PPHN. The available evidence for milrinone remains limited both as monotherapy and as an adjuvant to iNO. The studies were heterogeneous, conducted in different settings, with different populations and more importantly the endpoints of these trials were short-term outcomes such as changes in oxygenation and blood pressure. Large prospective studies investigating long-term outcomes, mortality, and the need for Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are warranted. Randomized controlled trials with milrinone as monotherapy are needed in LMICs where iNO availability remains limited. IMPACT: Milrinone has a potential role in the management of PPHN both as an adjuvant to iNO as well as a monotherapy. This scoping review identified the problems existing in the published literature on milrinone and the barriers to generalization of these results. Multi-centre randomized controlled trials on milrinone, especially involving centers from low- and middle-income countries are needed, where it can be evaluated as first-line pulmonary vasodilator therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38745027What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.