Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38744907›Full record

ArticleJournal of human hypertension2024

Participants' views of ultra-low dose combination therapy for high blood pressure: a mixed-methods study from the QUARTET trial.

Joshua G Kovoor, Clara K Chow, Abdul Salam, Ruth Webster, Louise Shiel, Mark R Nelson, Jacquita S Affandi, Peter Hay, Michael Burke, Gemma A Figtree and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Joshua G KovoorWestmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Clara K ChowWestmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Abdul SalamThe George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5870-7936
Ruth WebsterThe George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Louise ShielSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Prahran, VIC, Australia.
Mark R NelsonMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Jacquita S AffandiCurtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Peter HayCastle Hill Medical Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Michael BurkeKildare Road Medical Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7641-4435
Gemma A FigtreeKolling Institute, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Tim UsherwoodWestmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Christopher M ReidCurtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Markus P SchlaichDobney Hypertension Centre, Medical School - Royal Perth Hospital Unit and RPH Research Foundation, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1765-0195
Anthony RodgersWestmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Emily R AtkinsThe George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia. emily.atkins@unsw.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-2522-3510

Funding

Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 1092642Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 1100377Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 11359290Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 1136372
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-pill combination therapy containing four quarter-dose medications for high blood pressure improves BP control compared to monotherapy, however patient-reported acceptance of the quadpill as a treatment strategy remains undescribed. We collected within-trial feedback and interviewed participants from the quadruple ultra-low-dose treatment for hypertension (QUARTET) trial to characterise patient attitudes to this intervention. All trial participants were asked about ease and preference for the quadpill and provided an opportunity to give further comments on the trial at 12 weeks (trial primary endpoint) and 52 weeks extended follow-up. Separately, we used purposive and quota sampling for the semi-structured telephone interviews, with the resultant verbatim transcripts analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach. Themes were re-evaluated after each successive interview, and at suspected data saturation, an additional interview conducted for confirmation. At 12 weeks follow-up, 502 of 591 (85%) participants responded to acceptability questions, and 359 of 417 (86%) responded at week 52. Most reported the trial capsule easy or very easy to take. From eight sites, 16 participants were interviewed between 5 August 2020 and 19 November 2020. All described a positive experience, preferred once-daily morning dosing and found routine facilitated adherence. Participants valued individual responsibility for adherence, and involvement of the general practitioner in blood-pressure management. Most reported capsule size did not deter adherence but desired a smaller capsule. Participants described a preference for minimising number and dosage of medications, reduced capsule size, and once-daily morning dosing. These findings suggest a preference for single-pill combination therapy for blood pressure lowering.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureDrug CombinationsHypertensionAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient PreferenceRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive AgentsDrug Combinations

Identifiers

PMID38744907
PMCPMC11166564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.